Under The Perspective Of Public Finance To The United States, Britain, Australia In The Three Kingdoms Of Public Education Expenditure Analysis

With the continuous development of economy and society,sports gradually become an integral part of the daily life of the people.Sports is not only the strategy of sports power elite athletes to win glory for the country,but also become every citizen of daily life in the form of entertainment.People in the stadium,sports facilities and professional coach urgent needs,the government has to consider how to optimize to better development of public sports in order to meet this problem needs public expenditure structure of public sports funds,in order to solve this problem is not only based on our country,but should be based on the national society.On the basis of public finance theory,through the analysis of the Excel data in the UK,the US and Australia's annual financial report,as in China put forward feasible suggestions on how to optimize the expenditure structure of public sports,better development of public sports in order to meet the public demand.The reason to select the United States,Britain,Australia,Britain and the United States because of the traditional sports power,while Australia is belongs to the emerging sports power,these three countries have their own characteristics in the public sports financial funding sources and expenditure structure tendency etc..This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature,logical analysis and mathematical analysis of gropingly analysis of Australia and public expenditure,the initial conclusions are as follows:First,in terms of funding sources,the United States and Australia to make full use of national competition awareness,relying on broadcast rights and trademark rights to enrich the source of public sports funds,reduce the national financial pressure.The United Kingdom is the use of its domestic lottery fund income to enrich the country's public sports funds,so that the cause of lottery and public sports can make a win-win situation.In addition,the United States Olympic Committee as a non-governmental sports management organizations in the United States,each year can also get a lot of civil donations.Second,in the public sports expenditure,the US and UK,Australia will be a large number of financial investment to the construction and development of non governmental sports organizations,in order to consolidate the mass foundation of public sports,providing strong private capital for the country's public sports development,to achieve mass sports and competitive sports healthy development of the.However,due to the different sports management system of the three countries,the expenditurestructure of public sports funds is different.The United States Olympic Committee,in2009 to three in the past years,spending on member units accounted for about three of the total expenditure of the year of 47.9%.In England and Australia and the United States is completely different,the governments of two countries are on the public sports affairs are managed by government agencies,in 2010 to 2014 this five years for non government funded organization annual expenditure of total expenditure is as high as80% or so,it can be seen that the emphasis of the two Nations for NGOs in public sports expenditure,which is on the domestic primary sports attention.Thirst,the United Kingdom,the United States and Australia have not invested a lot of money in the operation of administrative institutions,the United Kingdom and Australia,the administrative cost of running only about 5% of the annual expenditure.Streamlined organization,efficient work style,is the three countries to save the operating costs and institutions to achieve the rapid development of public sports tips.The results of these studies provide a good inspiration for solving the problems such as the single source of financial funds,the tendency of fiscal expenditure,the international competition and the operating costs of state institutions.