The Cognitive Differences Research Of Existence Or Abolition Of The Death Penalty Of Corruption Bribery

So far,there were 141 countries to abolish the death penalty in law or in fact around the world which is more than 70% of the total number of nation.It is possible to say that abolishing the death penalty has increasingly become a worldwide trend.The route of abolition of the death penalty in China has moved very difficult and slowly,which particularly in the field of abolition of the non-violent death penalty and the reason is extremely complicated.With the deepening of the reform and the development of media technology,different social strata and interest differentiation are forming.The right way of treating the difference need use the experience of the theory of pluralist democracy thought-allow the existence of different opinions.The legislative process is the process of an organic dynamic movement which the various social strata interest are being carried out the collision and running-in.In front of problems of criminal law especially regarding the death penalty punishment,various interest groups do seek legal shelter certainly.The differences of interest,status,existing cognitive concept among various interest groups which caused cognitive differences of death penalty is different,so the controversy about the death penalty of reservation or abolition has never ceased.With the acceleration the process of the rule of law in our country,the people enthusiasm of participating in legislative work gradually enhanced and citizens have right to make the final decisions in public policy,hence public opinion and public recognition will be part of the policymakers and legislators which cannot be ignored.Based on this,the research of cognitive differences of the death penalty for reservation or abolition between the group and the embodiment of legislation will appear very realistic.From the perspective of cognitive difference,the paper investigates and analyzes the correlation of cognitive differences on death penalty for the bribery crime between different groups,interprets the legislative confrontation of the mentioned cognitive differences,and discusses the influence of public opinion on the legislative process,as well as explores the role of media in the process of legislation,etc.After a series of researches,this paper finds out that,in the cognitive process of the death penalty for the bribery crime,occupation,education level and gender affect the cognition of different subjects,such cognitive differences are mainly performed by the confrontation between the professionalism and the democracy of legislation.At the end,this article makes some reflections on the cognitive differences between harmonic subjects,believing that the legislative professionalism of the death penalty for the bribery crime should establish effective interaction with the public,and the lawmakers need to use media agenda setting theory to review and guide the public opinions,so as to promote the public identity in the legislative process.