Research On The System Of Publication Of The Appeal Cases Of The Procurator Agency

As one criminal complaint criminal proceedings, the criminal appeal cases to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests of the parties last remedy, safeguard judicial fairness and justice is the last barrier. Judicial decision on criminal appeal cases is directly related to the vital interests of the complainant. In judicial practice, prosecutors review the criminal appeal cases are closed, the lack of participation of the parties, so as to make unilateral decisions to the parties of a mysterious color. The program does not open, the possibility of highly opaque "black-box" appearance, but also in practice prosecutors usually either be maintained on file to review the court’s decision, the Court rejected the complainant’s appeal request, or not to be placed on file review, thereby leading to protest low, the complainant is difficult, and thus lead to long-term wound v bound to visit. The implementation of public prosecution criminal appeal cases of censorship, aimed at changing the enclosed investigators mode, to achieve transparent sun of justice, promote income v. Stop visit to achieve social harmony and stability. But due to some problems in the system itself, leading to poor run, failed to give full play to its functions, resulting in open censorship easily sidelined or a mere formality. Therefore, this criminal appeal cases to the prosecution disclosed Review System for the study, research and improve the system of great value to effectively solve the problem of the prosecution criminal complaint, to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests favorable complainant realized income v. Stop visit and maintain social stability. This paper mainly from the four parts, the main structure:Therefore, this criminal appeal cases to the prosecution disclosed the theme of censorship, the existence of several problems the system to study and make recommendations, we want an effective solution to handle the prosecution of a criminal complaint challenges a certain reference value. In this paper, the main structure is divided into three parts:Part I: From the criminal appeal cases before the prosecution disclosed censorship start, first of all the relevant concepts for public review and a defined scope and status of the prosecution described in the enclosed program to handle complaints, followed by analysis of criminal prosecution litigation value and need of public complaints review system as embodied in the last generation forth complaints of censorship and public health in practice.Part II: Public complaints review System in the slow development of judicial practice, the poor implementation of the System, have to examine the defects and shortcomings of their own existence. Start the program separately from irregularities, missing elected, hearing officers hearing host selection mechanisms, inadequate hearing comments and the lack of binding legal appeal hearing aid provision five issues were analyzed to explore the impact of public complaints review drawbacks of the system to carry out the effect of lies.Part III: complaints against public censorship problems put forward countermeasures and suggestions to start the mechanism First, standardize procedures; Second, improve the appeal hearing host selection mechanism; third is to improve the selection of hearing officers mechanisms; fourth is to strengthen hearing comments binding; and finally, for the public to review the complaint lack of legal aid, increase of criminal legal aid. Through these measures, the prosecution hopes to open a criminal appeal cases smoothly censorship played a role in promoting.