The Research Of Power Of Relatively Concentrated Administrative Punishment Concerning Urban Management

In 1996, the article 16 of the Administrative Punishment Law established the relatively concentrated administrative punishment system. This system is an important measure of the Administrative Law Enforcement System. In 1997, the State Council approved the launching of the relatively concentrated administrative punishment system in Beijing Xuanwu District. This is the first pilot of the system in the field of urban management of China. In 2002, the State Council issued the document of the 17th. Based on the spirit of the document, the system launched nationwide. Until now, there are over 1000 counties or cities carried out this system. After practice and discussion for nearly two decades, the system showing more and more important in the city. But it does not mean that the system is a perfect system. On the contrary, the system still exist many problems in theory and practice to be explored and resolved. Nanjing started pilot work in 2002. Nanjing as the developed eastern city, formed its own institutional practices in terms of urban management system. The author concerned about the conduct of this system in Nanjing started in 2015. When the author was in the process of collecting information, the author found this system have an important role in terms of improve the urban management level or increase the efficiency of law enforcement. Although this system has been carried out in Nanjing more than fourteen years. But the system still has many problems need to be solved.The paper is divided into three chapters, it mainly analyzes the situation of the relatively concentrated administrative punishment system in Nanjing. The author mainly use the empirical method in this article. The first chapter describes the legal basis of this system. This chapter focuses on the three aspects.They followed the concept of the relatively concentrated administrative punishment system, the background of this system and the legal basis of this system. In the second chapter, the author mainly described the conduct of the case of this system from six aspects in Nanjing. For example, from the aspect of the pilot approval; from the aspect of institutional settings; from the aspect of administrative costs; from the aspect of local legislation etc. At the same time, the author also describes the main results after the system carried out. In the third chapter, the author evaluated the legality of the system. Based on deficiencies of its existence, the author raised three improvement measures. Firstly, Clearthe qualification of the executive authorities and Strengthen the legislation. Secondly, implement the responsibility of violations of law enforcement procedures. Thirdly, standardize staffing and improve the quality of law enforcement personnel. If there is some help to the development of the relatively concentrated administrative punishment system in Nanjing, the author would appreciate it.