Grass-roots Social Organizations To Participate In The Pattern Of Rural Governance Study

Ultivariate rightist elements, is comprehensively deepen the reform of the rural social management system, build the socialist new countryside of important path. To deepen reform of rural governance in our country, is managed by one yuan to multiple governance excessive current, make full use of social organizations, especially the advantage of grassroots social organizations to participate in social governance, grasp the social organizations to participate in power, multi-channel multipath multimode all-round expansion and extension of primary-level organizations in the process of social governance, in order to mda will social organizations at the grass-roots level in rural governance to build and implement the normal operation of grassroots organizations to participate in social governance.In the research field of rural grassroots organizations to participate in social governance, many scholars in our country have carried on the thorough discussion and research, but mostly stay in the theoretical perspective of ideal, based on various theoretical discussion is given priority to, supplemented in various social organizations at the grass-roots level to participate in social management present situation and problems on simple analysis and with simple countermeasure, has not really build a set of perfect modelling of grassroots organizations to participate in social governance program.This article from the rural social organization construction and promoting social management innovation of theoretical analysis, a comprehensive analysis of the development present situation and the problems faced by the full research at home and abroad related school achievements of grass-roots organizations in rural governance, from the basic concept of the social management and social organizations at the grass-roots level to expand, the current situation of the development of present social organizations of our country and face the problem on the basis of background, with the degree of grass-roots organizations in rural governance environment on the basis of current situation and problems, taking zhejiang as an example, analytic zhejiang province rural social governance characteristics, and according to the basic survey data and reference data, the analysis summarizes the current situation of the development of zhejiang rural development organizations at the grass-roots level and the status of the degree of participation in governance, according to the construction of rural organizations and to promote social management innovation theory on the relationship between the research object, based on the combination of theory with practice, fully build synergy, samples should be modeled, plural provides valuable reference for zhejiang social governance.Based on the introduction, which is divided into four parts, the first part narrates the background and significance of grassroots organizations to participate in social management, and research in this field at home and abroad. The second part mainly introduces the concept of social organizations at the grass-roots level, category, development present situation and facing problems, at the same time introduces the social organizations at the grass-roots level in the role of participation in social governance. The third part mainly introduces the grass-roots social organizations to participate in the basic social governance mode and path. The fourth part introduces the basic-level organization development present situation and problems of zhejiang province, and introduced the yiwu and other places of temple grass-roots social organizations to participate in social governance model of innovation. Around the fifth part is based on zhejiang innovation practice experience of grass-roots social organizations to participate in the governance model optimization and reconstruction on the paths and measures are summarized and discussed, in order to build grassroots organizations to participate in the idealized model of social governance.