James H. Moor On The "Turing Test"

Can machines think like humans? This is not only a question of science and technology, but also a question of philosophy. Discussing this issue in the scientific and technological level, it is the question of the limit of artificial intelligence technology; Discussing in the philosophical level, it is the nature of human "mind".In 1950, Alan Mathison Turing proposed the “imitation game”, used to determine whether the machine can think, set off a tide of the development of artificial intelligence, caused extensive discussion in the field of philosophy of mind. The question of whether an operational test can replace the philosophy of "machine thinking" has become the subject of several generations of philosophers.James H. Moor, a professor of philosophy at the Dartmouth College, has a unique role in many researchers. As Turing’s hardcore supporters he active, open, keep the Turing test the validity of the rectification of names, not only has mature individual standpoint and from the viewpoint of the theory of system and newly old and runs through 30 years, with development characteristics of advancing with the times.In this paper, Moor opinions on the "Turing test" problem as the research starting point, to carry out thematic research. Summarizes the mole of inductive proof position "," artificial intelligence "position, the soul of the causal calculation and function of the socialist stance, and views on the existence of the Turing test, and systematically summarizes the Moor of" behaviorism ", of Searle’s" Chinese Room "on the card, criticism on the" feeling ", showing the Douglas’ s research of Moor’s criticism and molar response to criticism, complete outline of the relevant position of the mole" Turing test "as a whole. The paper also study the mole in the Turing test held the position of the merits and defects, and deepen the understanding of Turing test problems, deepen the understanding of the nature of the "mind".