The Research Of The Handyansty Dudges

Politic of Chinese ancient history,in a specific sense, is a kind of bureaucratic politics,so official system accounted for a large share of the Chinese history. The terms of reference, political way and results of the officials often determine the bureaucracy in a different spirit and a different political model. According to their different processing means, government officials can be divided into Judges and Officials.Judges as a distinct group in ancient China, mainly is known for its cruelty and killing prison as their extravagant features, in ancient China, almost judges of every dynasty were in the birth and development at the time of political contradiction and political changes, which in turn have a certain impact on the political situation. Han dynasty is the development period of feudalism in ancient China, the autocratic monarch was often subjected to various threats and pressures. In order to maintain and strengthen their rule, ruler appointed a large number of judges. Judges in the Han dynasty are the earliest recorded Judges in Chinese Chronicles, as the minions of maintaining the Emperor, have an important influence in politics. The judges of this period, their livesare accompanied by the present controversy, after death, their evaluation from civilian and politicians are hovered between good and bad. As the scholars of historical materialism in new era, we cannot be unilaterally defined the judges of Han dynasty are right and wrong, but should set out from the background, objective evaluation.From the perspective of guiding ideology, judges with the official line of legalism and law officers, has been increasingly influenced by Confucianism dominated. In the beginning of the Han dynasty, the aftermath of legalism still existing, the entire Empire have not formed a unified official guiding ideology, which make the officer road of pre-Qin law bring more influence on the whole bureaucracy, but judges in the Han dynasty practices far removed from pre-Qin Legalists in the true sense. With the rise of Confucianism, especially after rulers established as the official guiding ideology, thinking and behavior of the judges affected, and in the Western Han dynasty this influence are more profound than it in the Eastern Han dynasty, which lead tothe different behavior standards of judgesbetween Eastern Han and Western Han, the change of specific functions, and therefore the fate of the difference in outcomes.Judges alaways exit the opposite, which is Officials, the biggest difference between the two is focused on different aspects, Judges pay more attention to the laws and penalties and sanctions, pay attention to the untouchables, with draconian laws to achieve the purpose of social governance; but officials pay more attention to the probation and education, guide advocates, together with the ceremony, be advised class Nongsang dynasty, In order to achieve the stability of governance. Judges and Officials are all under the specific historical background and political environment, the ruling class and social contradictions need to generate, because of the social contradictions and political situation changes and not continue to fit in with the needs of the rule and temporarily out. Both Judges and Officials which is in a legal equal to the will of the ruler of the country, even if it is strictly abide by the law, the world is still is unfaired, the original should be sacred meaning of law, it can only fall tool of autocratic rule.