Clinical Observation On The Effect Of Promoting Diuresis With Drugs Of Tasteless Flavor In The Treatment Of Severe Diarrhea After Operation For Slow Transit Constipation

Objective Clinical observation on the effect of Promoting diuresis with drugs of tasteless flavor in the treatment of severe diarrhea after operation for slow transit constipationMethods 42 cases of severe slow transit constipation treated in our department from May 2013 to December 2014 were randomly treated with the method of prospective randomized controlled analysis. The traditional treatment with Draining Dampness treatment. There were no significant differences in age, sex. and operation between the two groups. The conventional treatment group (control group, n= 20) by nasogastric decompression device, fasting, the rational use of antibiotics, symptomatic and supportive therapy to correct water, electrolyte and acid-base balance disorder, parenteral nutrition support, postoperative symptoms of severe diarrhea with montmorillonite powder, compound diphenoxylate; and with Promoting diuresis with drugs of tasteless flavor group (treatment group) and 22 cases, in the traditional treatment method and used oral Promoting diuresis with drugs of tasteless flavor?Observe two groups of clinical indicators, namely diarrhea symptoms improvement, including abdominal pain and diarrhea, the number of daily bowel movements, rectal irritation, stool and other indicators of efficacy, further comparison of the two groups of indicators is statistically significant.Results:Two groups of patients were followed up to observe the curative effect and receipt of the corresponding data, followed up for six months to one year, the slow transit constipation patients with diarrhea after the colon and the improvement of the degree of symptoms were compared. Return visit content including abdominal pain and diarrhea symptoms, daily bowel movements, there is no rectal irritation, stool traits and other aspects of efficacy indicators. The improvement rate of diarrhea symptoms in the treatment group was better than that in the control group. The average daily stool frequency (3.35+1.86) in the treatment group was significantly less than that in the control group (7.25+3.62ml/L). The effective rate of treatment group was 91.42%, and the control group was 80%. The effective rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05)?Conclusion Subtotal resection of the colon in the treatment of severe slow transit constipation is a good treatment plan, but the majority of patients with difficult to control the symptoms of diarrhea. After surgical treatment and with light penetration dampness for oral administration of effective remission in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea, stool frequency increased, rectal irritation sign, stool pond and other symptoms have certain help.