Marx And Rawls Alocation Comparison And Enlightenment Ideas Of Justice

In our current market environment, exposed many problems of socialinjustice, conflicts in the area of revenue is particularly prominent.To properly and in-depth look at the distribution of income and solveproblems in the field of polarization exists, it must be in-depthdiscussion on the doctrinal view to identifying ways and means to solvethe problem. From ancient times, unlike in the West distributive justicescholars put forward their different points of view, the mostrepresentative is assigned Marx’s ideas of justice and distribution ofideas of justice Rawls.Marx believed that the study of human social life of distributivejustice issues must be from real people starting material productionactivities, only based on material production practices, in order to solvethe scientific problem of distributive justice. Rawls distributivejustice argument is taken to contract theory approach, this model makeshis whole argument ideological system of justice are built on contracttheory of logic. It is because of the two different theoretical basis,there is a big difference between the two led to substantive equality inliberty, justice and the conclusions on the allocation principles. Butwhile both Elaborating on its own allocation ideas of justice, but alsoacknowledged the impact the basic structure of human society, equalityand distributive justice concerns, attention to economic justice, arealso advocates of state power by means of standardized distribution.Through comparative analysis of the similarities and differences betweenthe two ideas of distributive justice, and the distribution of income andstatus of this stage are combined in order to draw the appropriateinspiration is the subject of this paper lies.