The Study Of The Quality Of Life In Rural-to-urban Migrants In Railway Construction Sites Of Lvliang And Health Education Intervention Study

Objective:(1) Determination of quality of life scale short form(WHOQOL BREF) is a PPlied to analyze the believe validity of migrant workers on railway construction site in Lvliang area;(2)A study of the status of life quality of migrant workers on railway construction site in Lvliang area is made through the questionnaire, with Possible influencing factors being analyzed;(3) Use interview data to make qualitative analysis, which is used as su PPlement for other Possible influencing factors which can’t be fully involved in the questionnaire;(4) Establish the health education intervention for migrant workers on railway construction site and im Plement the intervention, the effect of health education intervention is also evaluated.Methods:(1) Baseline survey: 950 migrant workers on railway construction site in Lvliang area were selected(extracted) through convenience sam Pling, researchers used cross-sectional study, a PPlication of self-made scale, social su PPort rating scale(SSRS) and determination of quality of life scale short form(WHOQOL BREF) to investigate those workers’ basic status, working conditions, social su PPort and quality of life.(2) Qualitative research: 9 migrant workers were randomly selected and interviewed. Researchers used digital recorder and notes to record the contents of those interviews, and then made qualitative analysis about factors affecting quality of life based on grounded theory.(3) Intervention study: With random number table, researchers took samples of intervention group(55) and control group(55) as a health education intervention research object, using Peer education, health knowledge lectures, health knowledge propaganda video, knowledge contest and other possible ways to intervene the quality of life of migrant workers in intervention group, and evaluated the effect of intervention by re Peatedly using application of determination of the world health organization quality of life scale short form(WHOQOL BREF).Results:(1) This study gave out 1011 questionnaires, 987 of them were taken back. The res Ponse rate was 97.6%. 950 of them were effective questionnaires. The effective rate was 96.3%. Most subjects showed strong consciousness to coo Perate and good adherence.(2) The determination of quality of life scale short form(WHOQOL BREF) analysis showed the reliability and validity for subjects’ Psychological and Physiological status, social relations and living conditions, the Cronbach al Pha coefficient were as follows: 0.723, 0.699, 0.812, 0.699, the results of 24 hours re Peatedly measurement were 0.755, 0.723, 0.789, 0.723, and the s Plit-half reliability was 0.653. The researchers used Princi Pal com Ponent analysis(PCA) to select four factors, the cumulative contribution rate is 66.272%.(3) The scores of the quality of life of migrant workers on railway construction site in Lvliang area were less than normal Po Pulation in each dimension: Physiological status(64.60±12.21), Psychological status(59.44±14.21), social relations(63.16±16.83), living conditions(48.71±15.98), overall quality of life(3.41±1.21), overall health status(3.43±1.02). Single factor analysis of variance showed that age, marital status, education level, Personal income, home address, home time interval, subjective social status were factors influencing the quality of life in each dimension. Multi Ple factors analysis suggested that social su PPort had more influence on quality of life in each dimension than other factors, and canonical correlation analysis further revealed the internal connection between social su PPort and quality of life.(4)The qualitative analysis results showed that the influencing factors on the quality of life of the railway construction migrant workers mainly includes: "the res Ponsibility of family", "inter Personal communication", "environmental factors" and "build in the future".(5)Re Petitive measure analysis of variance found significant differences between intervention grou P and control grou P in the Psychological status, social relations and overall quality of life; the differences varied with time, and due to different management, this changing trend became different, too. Further multi Ple com Parison(LSD)Pairwise com Parison method) demonstrated that there were significant differences between scores in the first test and instant test after test, also in the test before and test after delay in dimensions like Psychological status, social relations, and overall quality of life in intervention grou P, while the control grou P didn’t show significant differences.Conclusions:The scores of the quality of life of migrant workers on railway construction site in Lvliang area were less than normal Po Pulation in each dimension, with the environmental area scored lowest. The major factors affecting the quality of life were age, marital status, education level, Personal income, home address, home time interval, subjective social status. It was hel Pful to im Prove the scores in quality of life in dimensions like Psychological status, social su PPort and overall quality of life through scientific and reasonable health education intervention. This conclusion may serve as a reference for future research on migrant workers; it can also be useful for the government management of the migrant workers.