Research On Judicial Liberalism Of The Warren Court

US Supreme Court ushered in the "Warren Court" during the 1953-1969 year, in this period, with Chief Justice Earl: Warren Court uphold the liberal judicial philosophy, through the Brown v. Board of Education made the the first major ruling opened the floodgates to abolish apartheid, which began, Warren Baker v. Carr courts have adopted the case, Miranda v. Arizona case many other judgments made, changed American the constitutional doctrine, which in turn profoundly affected American society.The enormous scope of the Warren Court. It is in the progressive era judicial liberal tradition, based on the Warren Court judicial review and judicial precedents safeguarding the equal rights of citizens; dramatically expanded to protect freedom of speech and of the press; overthrow unequal distribution of legislative constituencies practice; give defendants in criminal cases more constitutional protection; for the first time acknowledged the constitutional sense of privacy.Warren Court’s judicial acts not only on American society in the 1950 s and 1960 s had a very strong impact, but also a profound impact on subsequent to the Supreme Court of Justice. In the 1970 s, the Supreme Court basically followed the liberal Warren Court’s judicial philosophy, and continued focus on the reality of the Warren Court’s judicial principles, judicial liberalism for a long time have been a distinctive feature of the Supreme Court. Even today, the vast majority of the Warren Court’s judicial decisions, particularly the decision relating to civil liberties and rights, is still valid precedent federal court system, the Warren Court profound influence of contemporary American society and institutional development of the Constitution beyond time.In this paper, the concept of the liberal Warren Court of Justice, based on the Warren Court explores the impact of judicial practice under the guidance of the concept of American society and the federal judicial system.