The Public Service Supply Mode Change Of Power And Rights

This article rationally analyzes if the “land for social security” is established inan entry point of the public service model changes in the supply of power and rights,and the needs and interests of protecting the rights of landless farmer’s perspective.Through the study we found that the popular point of view on the “land for socialsecurity” is open to question. It can not protect the landless farmers’ rights; instead, itcauses defects of farmers’ rights. However, we can not totally negate the “land forsocial security”. On a voluntary basis, farmers can use the proceeds to acquire land toprotect the interests beyond basic security.Since the reform and opening up, great changes occurred in China’s economicsociety. On one hand, industrialization and urbanization caused a substantial increasein the amount of land and rural land resources need to flow to urban that making alarge number of rural collective land expropriation. Meanwhile, the expansion ofagriculture and labor carrying capacity of urban decline in the amount of labor andemployment and this requires much-needed transfer of rural labor to urban areas. Onthe other hand, large-scale population flows to the cities. Whether the population intourban or rural areas is left behind lack of a social security system and faces various risks invasion."Land for social security" is the product of the process of economicand social transformation of urban and rural economic reform, and it is also theintegration of urban and rural areas and resources of a system to try and practice. Itoriginated in the land compensation for the industrialization and urbanization of landfor construction services. After that, with the accelerated process of urbanization andindustrialization, the form of "land for social security" is growing variously, and italso caused widespread concern in the community. Both in academia and industrypractice there are significant differences of whether it should be and how the rationalconstruction for “land for social security”. Seek a basic consensus and build a basicreason has extremely important theoretical value and practical significance forpromoting the development of the reform of the land system innovation and the urbanand rural social security system construction and even the whole social economy.