Khrushchev’s Governing Capability And Its Impact On The Soviet Union Socialism

In 74 years time the existence of the Soviet Union, and after the eight leaders, which have a significant impact on Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev and Gorbachev. For Khrushchev study which is quite rich, he ruled for about one sixth of the Soviet time. As ruler of the Soviet Union after Stalin, Khrushchev’s governing career for the development of Soviet socialism plays a vital role. He ruled for 11 years, but also reform for 11 years. He gave his country and the world has left a deep imprint contradictory. He is a very complex and controversial figure, he opened a prelude to the socialist reforms, launched a challenge to the Stalinist model, however, was never able to jump out of the framework of the Stalinist model of reform is just walking around in circles; he has the courage to reform and determination, but act reckless impulse, subjective, arbitrary.From the governing capacity of the core elements of the paper studies the impact of Khrushchev’s ability to govern the Soviet socialism. Firstly, based on performance during Khrushchev’s ruling, objective, impartial analysis and over-reactive during its ruling, the author proposed a historic comment about Khrushchev. Secondly, this paper will be combined with the historical facts, Khrushchev led the Soviet socialist reform and construction in the show’s ability to govern and make a clear and detailed analysis, including three levels, one of the guiding ideology of socialist construction deficiencies mainly in the lack of theoretical guidance of Marxism lack of capacity and ability to guide the scientific theory of party building; the second is lack of strategic thinking on socialist reforms, mainly in the lack of capacity to grasp the direction and strategy of reform, the lack of review and control global capabilities, lack of scientific decision-making and the ability to effectively promote the strategic objectives; the third is the lack of specific work, mainly in the bold but sloppy work, but more than anxious enthusiasm, but lack the courage to face the thorny issue of thought, thereby forming a structured, content complete research system’s ability to govern. Again, to clarify the lack of ability to govern on the basis of Khrushchev, Nikita Khrushchev will dig caused by lack of ability to govern partly because Khrushchev’s own subjective factors, including a lack of education and lack of normal culture system Marxist theory of learning, as well as its paradoxical dual personality; the other is the Soviet totalitarian regime, the influence of traditional bureaucracy, incompleteness cadre selection mechanism sick system. Finally, there is the end result of this study, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of Khrushchev’s ability to govern the construction of Soviet Socialism:simplistic critique of Stalin, led to confusion socialist camp; crappy reform measures to get rid of Stalin’s Soviet Union lose best time mode bondage; emotional decision-making and command, leading to frequent mistakes Soviet socialist construction; irrational foreign policy, serious damage to the reputation of socialism. Research theory is always service practices. This paper will lack the ability to govern Khrushchev facts, extending to the ruling party of my capacity building Reflections, which I put forward some suggestions to strengthen the party’s ability to govern.