The Present Situation And Research On The Improvement Of Answering System After The Sentence Of The Grassroots People’s Court Of Guilin City

Question answering system after the sentence is one of the new judicial system reform under the background of trial management implementation, which since 2005 the Supreme Court in the district court has vigorously pursued, have been practiced for ten years.However, Guilin city court system compared to other regions of the country, answering questions after judgment system is carried out in late 2010 after gradually standardize down. Although the question answering system in recent years in the specification Litigation petition, improve trial quality and other aspects of the sentence has played a positive role in the obvious, but the system still has many insufficient in the operation. The author through the analysis and comparison of the implementation of question answering system after judgment brings positive effect and which the deficiencies, lack of deep analysis of the reasons produced and put forward some reasonable suggestions, which has important significance for the development and perfection of the system of answering questions in the basic people’s court sentenced after Guilin city.In this paper, the basic people’s court in Guilin as the angle of view, through the use of survey method, comparative analysis, data analysis and other methods, based on analyzing the basic people’s court in Guilin city rules about answering questions after judgment and in-depth analysis, through empirical investigation, positive role analysis, literature analysis methods to survey the material to others details of Guilin city grassroots people’s court sentenced the implementation of question answering system produced and its existing problems, and then studies the question answering system to improve the basic people’s court sentenced after Guilin city from the angle of legislation and implementation.This article is divided into the introduction, the first part to the sixth part.The introduction of selected topic reason, the research goal and the significance, research review, research methods were summed up.The first part, the author firstly elaborates the concept of question answering system after judgment, probe into its background, theoretical basis of implementation of question answering system, question answering system of post sentence, sentence after the content and characteristics of the system, to have a rough understanding of.The second part the author analyzed by questionnaire answering questions after judgment system in different evaluation and view the grassroots people’s court Guilin internal existing, mainly including agree, negation as well as eclecticism three attitudes, and according to these three attitudes are given their own evaluation.The basic people’s court Guilin third part implements the positive role of answering questions after judgment, the author through the questionnaire and interview, data analysis, data access methods summed up answering questions after judgment system in the positive role, make up for the lack of judgment reasoning raise the exertion of judicial fairness and transparency, saving judicial resources, standardize the complaint letters and visits etc.The basic people’s court Guilin fourth part implements the deficiency existed in answering questions after judgment mainly includes the following several aspects, answering questions after judgment is easy to judge increased burden and pressure, answering questions after judgment to reduce the negative index as the objective, with strong purpose, some judges subject, to answer the questions after judgment system and insufficient understanding the sentence answering the scope and procedures are not clear and so on.The fifth part the author according to the existing problems of grassroots courts sentenced after answering, from research data analysis, think that answering questions after judgment system deficiencies mainly has the following several reasons:the lack of a unified answering questions after judgment rules; do not pay enough attention to the question answering work after judgment; judge sentenced after answering level needs to be improved; the parties did not establish the correct answering questions after judgment right consciousness.The sixth part according to the Q & amp; a system of post sentence problems put forward some reasonable suggestions for reasons of his own, including the development of a unified legal norms of answering questions after judgment, answering questions after judgment procedure, strengthen the court judge for answering questions after judgment work value degree, strengthen the judicial training, improve the comprehensive quality of judges, to strengthen the judicial publicity, to guide the parties to establish correct answering questions after judgment right consciousness.The conclusion part is a general summary of the whole thesis, certainly in answering questions after judgment system at the same time, the development and perfection of judicial colleagues appealed more to get into the system up, in order for the system to play a greater role in the construction of harmonious justice judicial environment.