The Theory Of “July School ” In The Early Formation And Development

“July Poetic School” is a poetic school formed in the wake of the influence of “July” and “Hope” under the guidance of Hu Feng, whose writing career ran through the whole process of the Anti-Japanese War and the Liberation War, and it finally became “the most influential poetic school in the last ten years of the Chinese modern literary history”. The “July Poetic School” in this article is discussed from the angle of historical periodical materials, trying to paint a complete original scene.In the first chapter of the paper, there is a brief review of the development of the Chinese new poetry before “July”, which provided the premise and foundation for high-quality creation of “July Poets”. Then Hu Feng was introduced due to his pivotal role in “July”, because he started and developed “July” with huge energy, and provided positive guidance to young poets. It can be said that without Hu Feng there would be no “July”, nor the “July Poetic School” at all. In the second chapter, it is necessary to explain the rationality and concrete viewpoints of this angle because the poetic school is discussed from the angle of periodical. Therefore, the author sorted out the relationship between periodicals and schools in the first section of this chapter, hoping to provide solid theoretical support for following paragraphs, which is also the theoretical starting point of setting the topic of the paper. Then it went on to “July” and “July Poetic School”, the object of this essay. In this section, it mainly discussed how “July” which is regarded as the cradle of “July Poetic School” created the space for development of this school of poems. In the last chapter, the author summarized the early style of “July Poetic School” through specific publication of the periodicals, and made discussion from respective viewpoints of contacts between periodicals and poets, periodicals and published poems and the style of periodicals and the style of the school. At the same time, the author also mentioned the misconceptions and problems of the school in creation at the end of the article.