Font Size: a A A

Study On The Influence Of College Students’ Positive Psychological Capital And Loving Attitude On Relationship Perception

Posted on:2016-12-13Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X Y ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2295330470962483Subject:Applied Psychology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objects: The aim of this research is to study the influence of college students’ positive psychological capital on loving attitude and relationship perception and to provide scientific evidences for college students’ psychological capital and love education.Methods: Appling Positive Psycap Questionnaire, the revised edition of Love Attitude Scale(LAS-R) and the scale of relationship perception index for unmarried people to investigate the influence of college students’ positive psychological capital on love and relationship perception. In this study, 754 college students of different majors from 3 universities in Dalian City were randomly chosen as subjects to complete questionnaire. Applying SPSS to analyze dates and results, then investigate the influence of college students’ positive psychological capital on love and relationship perception.Results: 1.The overall mean of positive psychological capital was 5.02, the Std.Deviation was 0.707, it means the midpoint value of the scale, in the middle or upper levels. Aera differences exist in college students’ overall positive psychological capital(t=2.046,p<0.05);Gender differences exist in college students’ self-efficacy(t=2.544,p<0.05), Aera differences exist in self-efficacy(t=3.131,p<0.01), The only child or not differences exist in self-efficacy(t=3.106,p<0.01), Student leader differences exist in self-efficacy(t=3.324,p<0.01), Premarital sex differences exist in self-efficacy(F=6.653,p<0.01); Gender differences exist in college students’ hope(t=-2.768,p<0.01), Long-distance relationship differences exist in college students’ hope(t=2.324,p<0.05), Premarital sex differences exist in college students’ hope(F=6.756,p<0.01). There were on differences in optimism and resilience.2. College students’ loving attitude got the highest score in pragma and the lowest score in ludus(M=3.64,SD=0.69;M=2.86, SD=0.69). Gender differences exist in eros(t=6.303,p<0.001), Love status differences exist in eros(t=2.143,p<0.05), Premarital sex differences exist in eros(F=5.443,p<0.01); Gender differences exist in ludus((t=4.473,p<0.001), Premarital sex differences exist in ludus( F=5.246,p<0.01); Gender differences exist in storge( t=2.327,p<0.05), Love status differences exist in storge(t=-2.453,p<0.05), Long-distancerelationship differences exist in storage(t=2.842,p<0.01); Gender differences exist in pragma(t=-4.639,p<0.001), Love status differences exist in pragma(t=-2.403,p<0.05), Long-distancerelationship differences exist in pragma(t=-2.102,p<0.05), Family type differences exist in pragma(t=3.549,p<0.05); Gender differences exist in agape(t=10.378,p<0.001); Premarital sex differences exist in mania(F=4.354,p<0.05). 3. The overall mean of relationship perception was 4.70, the Std.Deviation was 0.66, college students got higher score in devepment, satisfactions, equivalence and lower score in conflict(M=5.28,SD=1.07;M=5.34,SD=1.14;M=5.19,SD=1.13;M=3.01,SD=1.34). Student leader differences exist in the whole scale( t=2.260,p<0.05); Premarital sex differences exist in the whole scale(F=3.380,p<0.05). Student leader differences exist in devepment(t=2.440,p<0.05). Gender differences exist in conflict(t=2.312,p<0.05). Aera differences exist in equivalence(t=1.978,p<0.05).4. College students’ overall positive psychological capital is related to the whole scale of relationship perception, devepment, satisfactions and equivalence positively(r=0.414; r=0.430;r=0.424;r=0.371,p<0.01). College students’ overall positive psychological capital is related to conflict negatively(r=-0.308 p<0.01); The whole scale of relationship perception is related to eros, storge, pragma, mania and agape positively(r=0.575;r=0.337;r=0.284;r=0.189;r=0.335 p<0.01);5. College students’ hope, optimism, eros, mania, storge can predict relationship perception; Sex, hope, optimism, eros, storge, and ludus can predict devepment; College students’ overall positive psychological capital, hope, eros, agape, mania and ludus can predict satisfactions; Ludus, mania, hipe, resilience, eros, sex can predict conflict; College students’ overall positive psychological capital, eros, storge, pragma, mania, resilience, ludus can predict equivalence.Conclusion: College students’ positive psychological capital have significant influences on relationship perception, Hope and optimism affect relationship perception positively. College students’ loving attitude have significant influences on relationship perception. eros, mania and storge affect relationship perception positively.
Keywords/Search Tags:positive psychological capital, loving attitude, relationship perception
PDF Full Text Request
Related items