Government Behavior In Guangxi Mulao Cultural Resources In The Process Of Industrialization

With the deepening of globalization, the competition between nations has turned "softpower" of the contest by the "hard power."Since World War II," soft power" first proposed by theAmerican scholar Joseph Nye, then got widespread academic research. Currently, the US-basedWestern countries a new round of" aggression"(cultural invasion) had begun. Since the reformand opening up, China’s economy has made considerable progress. Meanwhile, as foreignadvanced technology, advanced culture into people’s lives, the domestic outstanding nationalcultural traditions increasingly faced with the impact of Western culture, some of the nationalculture has disappeared, national culture has gradually become a "rare minerals". How to protectand develop national culture? This issue is becoming a major problem faced by the governmenttoday. To this end, the development of cultural industries, foster cultural economy, optimizingculture, enhance cultural competitiveness, which has become an important task at this stage ofChina’s socialist harmonious society. Meanwhile, the development of cultural industry is to builda beautiful China, an important measure to achieve the great rejuvenation of the Chinese dream.Cultural industries is generated and developed in this context.National culture is not only a true portrayal of the local customs, or characterization of theregion’s cultural soft power, national cultural industries is one of the important contents of thecurrent regional development. In the course of the development of cultural industries, it is oftenvague uncertainty that the role of government in the market allocation of resources. Scholarsaround the world have different views on government and the market determines the behavior ofthe boundary. It is essential that the process of industrialization of government action research.Therefore, what the government should bear responsibility in cultural resource industrialization?This question is the focus of this analysis.This paper describes the theory of cultural industries, basic theory of government behaviorand governance theory. Using field survey methods, methods of literature analysis, comparativeanalysis, etc. Analysis of government behavior in Mulao national cultural resources in theprocess of industrialization. This paper is divided into five parts, seven chapters. Part I:Preamble.This section of the article to make a simple statement about the research background,significance, current research, research methods and contents of this article. Part II: the firstchapter. This section focuses on the theory explains the basis of this article. The main use ofrelevant ideas(explained later)governance theory and behavior management for both governanceand government Horizon compared to illustrate the principles of government actions under thebackground of the current era. Part III: Chapter Two, Chapter Three, Chapter Four. In this section,the author of the national cultural resources Mulao government conduct an empirical analysis illustrates the cultural resources of the government playing the role of industrialization,inadequate behavior of the government in the industrialization of cultural resources andinadequate causes. Part IV: Chapter Five. Author for the study of Tai wan and South Korea, twoareas of cultural industries in government behavior were discussed and analyzed the inspirationfor the development of China’s cultural industry. Part V: Chapter VI. In this chapter, the author ofthe national cultural resource optimization Mulao industrialization of government action putforward relevant countermeasures. The authors concluded that the government in the process ofindustrialization and cultural resources should do the following. First, it should limit thegovernment’s actions; Second, the government should develop a scientific and rationaldevelopment plan; Finally, the government should actively cooperate with social organizations.