The Drawback Of Husserl’s Transcendence From A Customary Standpoint

Transcendence in Husserl’s thought means two sides:earned transcendental ego and transcend transcendental ego to gain the things from outside, the former request to epoche experience, and the latter request for tolerant transcendence of experience, thus, Husserl can establish a system of philosophy on the basis of transcendental ego. Although the experience things in the process don’t work, but for Husserl, it is because of the stripping, transcending and contrasting of experience things that transcendental ego finally earned itself. So, Husserl thinks that transcendental ego is the purest and most thorough basis of the world, and has no any contents of experience.However, after analyzing the history of western philosophy, this paper thinks that although many great philosophers have tried to get the clearest basis of the world by spinning or transcending the experience, eventually, they bring us the collapse of the whole theory. That is to say, the theory comes from the combined action of prior experience and the experience, and experience always show new contents in the space and time and constantly forcing prior to "bound" these new contents and forcing theory continuously request higher of itself. The contents of prior experience and experience always mingled when they appeared in the object of our minds, making us fail to tell what is "noema" and "noema of intentional behavior".Logic, thinking law, ontology, the basis of the world, etc. no matter what kind of things that we ever confidently thought of are pure things, they must contain two sides of priori and experience, which comes from and higher than experience, they must push themselves to higher realm in the process of inter movement between prior and experience, This kind of view makes this paper produce a customary position as the start point of the vision of theory.After establishing the customary position, this paper questioned the completeness and purity of Husserl’s transcendental ego, by analyzing the performance of the transcendence of transcendental ego, this paper points that the experience factor or empiricism thinking still unconsciously performed in Husserl’s process of transcend and transcendental ego.However, it is not the purpose of the paper to prove that there is empiricism thinking in Husserl’s transcendence, the purpose of this paper, just as what has said in the introduction, is that only distinguish which kind of reason people should be guided can we truly achieve the purpose of existence. So, this article titled "the empiricism in Husserl’s transcendence from a customary standpoint", this does not mean to blame the problems of Husserl, but to conclude from this analysis that in what extent Husserl’s way of thinking promoted the development of the understanding existence purpose, and all those potential problem of thinking that still not overcome by our time from the problems he left.