| Purpose:Through the clinical observation of the effect of APA and PFNA-Ⅱ in the treatment of IFF, the analysis and comparison of these two different internal fixation system in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur (IFF) the curative effect differenceMethods:This article mainly through systematic review of intertrochanteric fractures of the understanding of modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine, summarize the IFF anatomic basis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, classification and treatment of type. The topic for the 2014 January to 2014 July admitted 59 cases of intertrochanteric fracture patients were retrospective case-control study. The PFNA-Ⅱ in 29 cases,30 cases of APA. Bookmarks to assess the general clinical data between the two groups was not statistically significant, comparable. Each of the two operation modes of surgical trauma, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed.Results:The experimental results indicate that PFNA-Ⅱ group and APA group, the operation time, bleeding, postoperative complications had no significant statistical significance in operation, suggest that there was no significant difference (P>0.05), postoperative fracture healing time, postoperative recovery is also no statistically significant, suggesting that there was no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion:The research concluded that no obvious difference in the curative effect in the treatment of IFF of PFNA-II group and APA group, whereas APA is relatively inexpensive, clinical on canpromote the use of. |
PDF Full Text Request