The Research Of Fabrication, Deliberate Dissemination Of False Terrorist Information

Fabrication, deliberate dissemination of false terrorist information (hereinafter referred to as the crime) is a new accusation in recent years China has appeared. Violation of this crime is often affect social order and social order, including social life, social management, public service, public facilities and public standards and other aspects, in the "criminal law" article291enacted before, if imposed by the act of the crime of the crime, in accordance with the general infringement object the and the result will be assigned to incite the fission country crime, the crime of obstruction of official business and other charges to be identified. In recent years, the case law is more and more high, the area is more and more widely, both economic and cultural development area, will appear in he crime. At present, for the legislation of this crime is not perfect, the previous judicial experience has been difficult to adapt to the changes in the practice of. So, for the current practice and theory of justice for fabricating crime of intentionally spreading false terrorist information constitute the crime with his distinction between sin and judicial practice-related issues identified so controversial, in this paper, combining the theory and practice of in-depth exploration, hoping to provide reference for the judicial practice.This paper mainly from the following four aspects:The first part introduces the fabricated deliberately spreading false terrorist information constitutes the crime. Specifically including the object of the crime, the objective aspect of the crime, the subject of this crime, the subjective aspect of the crime.The second part introduces the crime of this crime. First discusses the theory of judicial practice and research to stop this crime of crimes recognized form of controversy, uncertainty; secondly discusses the theory of judicial practice and research in the form of an accomplice in the crime finds controversy uncertainty.The third part, connecting, which are verified in practice, for the deepening of theory, in order to pave the way for the fourth part. The fourth part is on the basis of the three parts, a summary and promotion of the whole thesis, analysis and research practice and the theory of the crime causes of disputes, and learn from foreign legislative experience, puts forward the proposal on how to perfect the legislation of our country.