Grassroots Prosecutors Investigating Malfeasance Cases Present Situation And Reflection

Dereliction of duty is a state personnel dereliction of duty, abuse of power, corruption crimes, its essential characteristic laws, lax enforcement and abuse of power. Involving people’s livelihood, serious damage to people’s public interests, social impact of dereliction of duty cases in the provinces and municipalities have a sudden, multiple phenomena, a serious impediment to the socialist rule of law process, jeopardize social harmony and stability of the construction. Although the1997Criminal Code has increased the malfeasance crime crackdown, specially set up a "dereliction of duty" section, the legislature length and content relative to the1979Penal Code has dramatically increased. But with the judicial practice of the use of national prosecutors at all levels against malfeasance departments investigate dereliction of duty cases work in general into a corner, and even some local investigative number drastically reduced. Practice on the one hand some places breakthrough cases difficult, even for several years was no case situation, on the other hand society some serious harm to the state, society, the collective and the people’s interests malpractice cases frequently, and some have inflicted enormous damage to property Some adverse social impact. The author of the current investigation dereliction of duty cases reflected the theoretical controversies and practice bottleneck studied by analyzing the grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases the difficulties and the reasons put forward to strengthen grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases proposals, and strive to achieve punish dereliction of duty, curb dereliction of duty purposes.Text of this paper consists of three parts. The first chapter is the grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases the status quo. Analysis grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases the results achieved and the new situation facing the certainty of prosecution in the anti-ditch work achievements, but also illustrates the anti-ditch work is facing a new situation and new challenges.Chapter grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases the difficulties and causes. Our grassroots prosecution in anti-ditch work still exists "discovery difficult, hard evidence, handling difficult, high resistance" This "three difficult one big" problem. Herein both internal factors also have an external cause. Internal causes include malpractice cases has a strong professional and intelligent, and highly covert and deceptive, with responsibility for dispersion and background complexity three aspects; external causes, including dereliction of duty, legislative shortcomings, anti-ditch work publicity is not in place, anti-ditch ranks low quality and other aspects.The third chapter is to strengthen grassroots prosecutors investigating malfeasance cases advice. The first is to strengthen the ideological understanding, followed by the improvement of legislation, moreover actively broaden malfeasance case the source channels, and finally the establishment of efficient ditch detection mechanism.