On The Problem In Procedural Legalization Of Macroeconomic Regulation

China always emphasizes the use of macroeconomic regulation to direct and adjust economic situation. The boost of economy by macroeconomic regulation should be admitted. Meanwhile the failure of macroeconomic operation should also be recognized. Undoubtedly one of the most important reasons is insufficient supply of law resources.The strategy of law consolidation means the introduction of "rule of law". Actually the procedural legalization of macroeconomic regulation is not an adventure under the direction of "The universal theory of law" or a reaction to the principle of "maximizing the function of market, minimizing the function of power". There are two ways to achieve legalization of macroeconomic regulation:one is "substantive rules pattern",the other is " due procedure pattern". Because macroeconomic regulation is professional and complicated, the former way is hard to play a proper role. However, the construction of procedure fulfills values of authorization, power control, boost of economic democracy and macroeconomic regulation effect enhancing, which also gets the influence of "decision making according to the circumstance" avoided. Therefore, it is the key way to achieve legalization of macroeconomic regulation. The procedures of macroeconomic regulation contain decision-making procedure, enforcement procedure, supervision procedure and consequence-handling procedure. Legalizations of these procedures should not only respect existing macroeconomic regulation system and situation, but also widen the application of democracy and publication. On consequence-handling procedure, the macroeconomic regulation law should take the actionablity into consideration, that means the duty of macroeconomic regulation should be investigated through contentions procedure, which ensures an implement of power-duty unity. Different to private interest-oriented civil litigation and administrative litigation, the public interest litigation highlights the protections of public interest, which provides a high consistency between public interest litigation and macroeconomic regulation litigation and meets the need of requirements of actionability. In order to give a effective and timely protection to public interest, the construction of public interest litigation in macroeconomic regulation should take the focus on litigants system, evidence system, judgment system and so on.