Root Of Human Knowledge "verbal" And "image"

Because of being associated with culture issue instantly, the relationship between imageand language has been focused. An evidence is that people feel suitable in using “visualculture” which word be used to show the tendency of recognition in usual. But, we use theword “culture” more and more careless which because that people cannot get a coincidemeaning of it for a long time.. What dose culture’s characteristic described by “visual culture”?Can we reason out that people has been shaped with a image recognition be rooted in naturewhich just because of the explosion of images at once? In fact, the “images explosion” timecomes with “language explosion” time either. The boundary between interpretation andover-interpretation has been more and more obscure. Dialog and discussing has been moreand more public and random. In fact, we cannot imagination a kind of “image explosion”which be independent with language, and vice versa.The paper’s basic sense is that we do not preinstall a background of technology time, andalso we do not be on the transcendental position of “image hegemony”, and also focus theangle on which take the “relationship of image and language” into a consideration ofproportion. In contract, we put the discussion on the base level of recognition. At first, weresearch the source of recognition about “relationship of image and language”, and analyzephilosophical theories’“device” which means very foundation to nowadays relationship. Andthen, take considerate of several elementary proposition, and as a cultural anthropology Angleof view, explore "relations" of research in human cognition way and the significance ofcultural construction..