The Comparative Research On The History Table Of Mingshu And Mingshi

Ming shu and Ming shi, which compiled in uncontinuous periods of Qing Dynasty,were two great general historical writings of Ming Dynasty. Historical tables were themost important components of these two periodic biographical historical writings. Theobjects which were recorded by these two historical tables were so nearly same that thecomparative study could be processed naturally according the finishing time-points ofthese two writings.The factors and levels of comparative study were determined into three classes andsix terms according the compilation of these two writings, to examine the similarities anddifferences of the historical tables by comparative historical methods.The first part of this article was the compilation of the historical tables about Mingshu and Ming shi. The brief review was executed about the compilation of the historicaltables about Ming shu by Fu Wei-Lin according the basic materials and historianconsensus. The same review was executed about the compilation of the historical tablesabout Ming shi, furtherly, the participation of Si Tong,Wan Yan and Wang You-Dun werealmost confirmed, and ensured Wan Yan as the writer of the list of emperors in thehistorical table about Ming shi.The second part is two books history table compiling principle and the comparisonof historical data sources. This branch, the author will "Ming" and "Ming" s tablecompiling principle and the historical data sources are compared. In compiling principle,history of Ming book table for historical textual research, perfect JiChuan briefly,generation of historic, rest remains. Although it contains the history truth and practicalsignificance, but its essence is not beyond the category of academic research. Embodiedthe chronicle the purport of the Ming history table in addition to the same as the historyof Ming book table for academic purposes, more contains political purpose, that is tookby imperial history, and establish the qing dynasty orthodox image, woo han Chineseintellectuals in their place, to tame their anti-japan sentiment and so on. Say so,"Ming"chronicle the purport of the history table represents the history of Ming book table. Inhistorical sources, most of history of Ming book table from wang shizhen explore how did classificatory books disseminate Yan hill hall, after Fu Wei scales of increase anddecrease, modify the registration book. Now this book lies in the qing dynasty of theMing history table and revised "Ming", its many other fix code engineering achievementsof the Ming-Wan Sitong "Ming" and Wang Hongxu "draft" of the Ming.The third part is the history of two books set table style and content of generalcomparison. This paragraph, the author compare two style in the book the history of tablesetting is divided into macroscopic and microscopic two angles, on the macro part refersto the history of historical records of the table according to the recorded object divisiontitle; Micro level refers to the specific layout of each history table. The Ming historytable while the macro is far less than the history of Ming book table, but its ingenious setway, expanding the capacity of history table, complexity in Jane, to some extent make upfor the history of table content too little account of the problem. Can say, in the aspect ofstyle is set, the Ming history table is more efficient than the Ming history. In terms ofcontent detailed slightly,"Ming" s table time span longer than on the history of Mingbook table, but some of the history table content exists deficiency leakage phenomenon;The history of Ming book table time limit is short, but its recorded history timecoherence, no interruption. As a result, the Ming history table part compared with thehistory of Ming book table part, moreover, there is no obvious advantages anddisadvantages.The fouth part was the the comparative results between the value of material andacademic influence. The analysis of the material value the historical tables about Mingshu and Ming shi was executed to conclude that the material value was very significant.The academic research situation about these two historical tables was briefly reviewed todiscover the study of Ming shi was advantaged above Ming shu on the quality andquantity levels.The aims of the multi-dimensioned compare between two historical tables are notonly to judge the quality but also to emphasize the specifications.The author try todemanstrate the evolutional process of historiography on the setting of styles andmaterial origins and aims of compilation. In this specific case,the author tried to revealthe mainstream of evolution of history in the nearly one hundred year history whichbegan at the foundation of Qing Dynasty.