Legal Consideration Deng Medicines To Help The Mother Euthanasia Case

Along with the development of modern economy, China’s mateiral civilization and spiritcivilization has made a lot of progress, people life level，medical and health level alsocontinuously improve, people pay more and more attention to health problems. The body isthe most important capital, as the body when problems occur that was empty talk. People’sworld outlook, the outlook on life, the values have also changed，many in the face of thegravely ill patients in the healing process expeirence pain to the choice also began to swing，on the one hand，alive to undergo bear the pain, on the other hand can choose to diepeacefully. Euthanasia has long before problems in European and American countires led to alot of response, currently the world, only the Netherlands and Belgium two countires in theform of law confirmed the legitimacy of euthanasia, other countires are mostly in practicespecific case is particular processing. Our country law about euthanasia has been twittering, inrecent years the doctor-patient relationship problems increasingly acute, and people’s healthcare know have gradually, pay attention to the view from the survival has been transferred tothe quality of survival, no longer only stressed the need to live, the more stressed the need tolive with dignity and especially in the healing process. Now in addition to the attention to"had to live" problem, more attention should be paid a lot of people fell ill because ofifnancial difficulties or medical conditions were bad and the "die" problem.This text, according to the case analysis paper structure，to buy pesticide to help mothereuthanasia cases the existence of the tough issues analysis, the central issue for the differenceson vairous disputes，closely combining case, the case for such cases around in the judicialpractice in all its problems，and puts forward relevant suggestions.The ifrst part was the courts. Also is a buy pesticide help mother euthanasia cases.The second part was that the case is introduced. Mainly is the introduction of the case.The third part was the central issue of the case and disagreement. This part mainlyintroduces involved in the case of the main focus has three a whether action constitutes acirme，the plot of the sentencing of the dispute，in the judicial process in the role of the publicopinion about the controversial problems.The foutrh part was analysis and discussion. Part of this is the key of this paper. Basedon a behavior is a cirme analysis made atfer the two perspectives analysis with this case thatof act constitutes a cirme. The author rfom the cirme object, objective behavior, subjective etc, for the behavior of a concluded that in our country at present legal rfamework can only asintentional homicide. Then, the circumstances of the cirme of the perpetrator analysis,according to the plot of the sentencing can influence to choose appropirate sentencing class.Finally, the paper analyzed the judicial process, public opinion in the role of the publicopinion as a discretionary sentencing to apply to the punishment.The fifth part was conclusions and Suggestions. First of all，according to the above tocarry on the summary, and then by the cases in which lead in the judicial practice such casestreatment should be noted, according to the relevant question from prevention mechanism andlegal improvement Suggestions in order to alleviate the conflict between law and affection.