Government Performance Evaluation Of Public Participation: Status、 Problem And Countermeasures

Government performance evaluation of the public participation in localgovernment performance evaluation, there are some problems and the insufficiency isnot conducive to the government function under the background of the out. Althoughour country some local government has adopted the public participation ingovernment performance evaluation way, but it only for non modern (" top-down ")model of supplement, not very mature. Due to our country democracy politicalpractice, government system mechanism and the government performancemanagement theory study constraints and restriction, of our local governmentperformance evaluation system still has some drawbacks, this also causes publicparticipation in government performance evaluation activities of the universality andfeasibility, breadth and depth are subject to certain influence. In the domestic andforeign government performance evaluation in the process of comparing, foreignowing to historical comparative long, the system is complete, appear relatively mature.And our place in the performance evaluation, social public participation enthusiasmfully enough, social public participation in government performance evaluationsystem is not perfect.Therefore, if you want to change this situation, we must from theessence of government performance evaluation to find out the causes of theseproblems. Again in the practice of western countries for reference the successfulexperience to perfect our government performance evaluation system and promotinglocal government performance evaluation constant development.This article discusses from four aspects:First, the government performance evaluation overview. In this part mainlydivides into four parts, the first part mainly expounds the related concept, the"performance","performance evaluation" concept, so as to elicit "governmentperformance evaluation" concept. Government performance evaluation, which is"according to performance plan, the government office and its staff work to makeevaluation and judgment activities. Then from the macro and micro Angle to go respectively. The second part expounds the basic principle of governmentperformance evaluation. The basic principle of government performance evaluationmainly includes objective and fair principles, performance first principle, democraticpublic principle and rewards and punishment will now principle. The third partexpounds the objective of government performance evaluation. Governmentperformance evaluation is the objective of the action plan and goal achieved;Real-time to provide management decision-making basis; Public servants form thehabit of self management; Become the government internal coordinationcommunication hub; To realize mining office personnel’s internal potential. Thefourth part expounds government performance evaluation system of the basicelements. Government performance evaluation system of the basic elements includeevaluation subject, evaluation object (or objects) as well as the evaluation indexsystem.Second, the government performance evaluation of the present situation of thepublic participation. Although our country some local government has adopted thepublic participation in government performance evaluation way, but it only for nonmodern (" top-down ") model of supplement, not very mature. Because they are butbecause of democratic politics of our country by practice, government systemmechanism and the government performance management theory study constraintsand restriction, of our local government performance evaluation system still has somedrawbacks, this also causes public participation in government performanceevaluation activities of the universality and feasibility, breadth and depth are subjectto certain influence. Evaluation subject ability and property and evaluation objectsand the design of the index does not match; The lack of institutionalization rules andlag; Evaluate the results can not be very good use; Evaluate the organization andimplementation of lack of necessary professional and independence.Third, the performance evaluation of public participation in the problem. Mainlyhas the following several kind of problem: social public participation in governmentperformance evaluation degree is not high, many in the go through the motions, Somelocal governments have the social public to participate in evaluation, but the ability toparticipate in is weak. Social public participation in the evaluation system andmechanism is not sound, causing evaluation has a lot of limitations; Based on theelectronic government affairs development of government performance evaluation isnot enough, it caused the government information openness degree is low, the operation ways opaque.Fourth, Government performance evaluation system of the public participationcountermeasures. Mainly aiming at Chinese government performance evaluationsystem present situation, puts forward a few kinds of strategies: make the assessmentmain structure reasonable and constitute diverse for public participation in creatingthe objective environment; Make public comprehensive ability evaluation ofcontinued ascension to ensure public participation in quality. Make the assessment tocash rewards and punishments to mobilize public participation enthusiasm; Toaccelerate the development of electronic government affairs in order to enhance thepublic participation.Any thing development from the beginning to the mature stage all need a processof trial and error,"democratic appraisal" is also so. Although the citizen participationin government performance evaluation at present there are still some problems, but itis our country administrative management system innovation, its practicalsignificance is huge. Along with our country the researchers to performanceevaluation theory research and practitioners to further explore, our governmentperformance evaluation system will be gradually mature, citizen participation ingovernment performance evaluation will have better system as guarantee, makepeople’s satisfaction continuously improve, and for public sector performanceimprovement continuously provide solid system guarantee.