The Perspective Of Postmodern Jurisprudence Of Constructive Legal Entity

In this thesis, entitled The construction of legal subjects in thePostmodern Jurisprudence Perspective, from reading the literature ofpostmodern culture and postmodern jurisprudence, combined with theBeat Generation literary creation, trying to seek the main body of thepost-modern jurisprudence Construction of the truth of the sexualdimension.The two major political forces during the Cold War and enters themodern civilization, especially the Western social integration asdeveloped period, a lot of social, economic and political problemscome one after another, the two world wars in the early20th century tobring the trauma of the human spirit; for alien exclusion and repression;North-South gap between rich and poor widening; the war is stillswirling...In the1970s, resulting in postmodernism, the most influentialWestern academics Postmodern Jurisprudence which issued thestrongest voice of post-modernism in legal theory. PostmodernJurisprudence reflects the reflection of the modern Westernjurisprudence, deconstruction, and beyond. In modern legal theory,law is based on a conservative point of view, the attitude is neutral,universal value perspective appear. The law in maintaining socialorder and stability, to promote social development and human rightsprogress, the contribution can not be forgotten. However, in the newera of modern law is facing its own crisis of legitimacy. Jurists ofpostmodernism will reflect on the object against the foundation of itsexistence by the Modern Law-basic principles, the concept of the ruleof law, in an attempt to elaborate modern jurisprudence under theexisting rules-the principle of system for the protection of the stronginterests of, and the forgotten vulnerable groups indifference. Attempting to subvert the post-modern jurists contains a pulseaccording to legend the metaphysical essence of modernjurisprudence, to break the discourse hegemony, makingnon-mainstream, the edge of the main words of the existence of space.I believe that the defense for the post-modern jurisprudencethought, first of all to be more objective, comprehensive analysis themeaning of the words in the modern context, the existing post-modernbright Legal Thought, as well as post-modern jurisprudence thoughtwithin the various types of contention and reflect the battle of the"modern" and "postmodern" in the existing legal works. The perspectiveof the post-modern jurists, law and literature in this one matter, but dueto the concept of hegemony of modern jurisprudence, which led to theclosure of the Modern Law.In order to find the deconstruction of the system, modernjurisprudence has attracted the concern of many Chinese and foreignlegal scholars, the West, the rise of modern jurisprudence does notmean that it has replaced the dominant position of modernjurisprudence, can be said that post-modern jurisprudence in the Westis still in the development in theory, need more practice to research.In this paper, modern literary creation of literature Analysis aftermodern jurisprudence the main ideology of purpose and meaning is: apoint to explore postmodernism constructive main concepts with faceto prove that in the post-modern jurisprudence still exist with a lot ofconstructive content, modern jurists are not advocates of the legal endof the world, but the rule of law newborn prophet.