| With the invasion of Western colonizers, forced input of Western civilization has changed the course of development of Chinese civilization. Formed by thousands of years of traditional Chinese architecture system gradually toward the decline in social development, modern building system gradually built up at home. But the older generation of architects has never stopped building in the pursuit of traditional national culture, and left a good architectural works and flashing brilliant ideological and theoretical. Today with the continuous deepening and development of the global economic, political and cultural integration, the traditional culture of the Chinese nation stuck in the awkward position. Today, now that the Chinese construction industry ocean in vogue, the local architectural and cultural history of fracture and local architects chicken collective aphasia is quite worrying. This article by listing the analysis to explore the road of modern architects and architectural design firms in their works, summarized and combing performance in the background of modern building system to establish and develop rapidly in China, the modern successor of the traditional national spirit, in order to later researchers to be a reference for.The first part, which is the first chapter, explain the background to the study, significance and research to limit the scope of research.The second part is a collection of architectural culture on the traditional inheritance of the nation thought.The third part, which is considering the development process of the national tradition inherited as a clue, is divided into two chapters (the second and third chapters). As mentioned in Chapter Ⅱ of the traditional national revival of the three climax is more recognized in academia, so this chapter is a detailed description of these three times the background and representative works of the climax do. Explore the road of reform and opening up as discussed in Chapter Ⅲ is a multiple approach to development co-exist and still continue to change. Academia has not unified understanding, and so of the classification of its own understanding from the perspective of the different artistic tendencies described.The fourth part is to summarize several performance practices of the traditional national spirit of modern architecture in China.The fifth part is a summary of the national traditional spirit of the modern successor to the course, and the author’s point of view. |