Font Size: a A A

A Research To The Structure Of "P Is P, Q" In Modern Chinese

Posted on:2014-02-02Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Q WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2235330395494129Subject:Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the first chapter, the object of the research are put forward, which is "PisP,Q".Through some lanyard samples, we find that the format is present in the words ofancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, however, Community recognized the strongexplanatory power of generative grammar that recognized strong is at a loss to explainthe format,so we have to study it comprehensively, in order to find the reason thatis formed and understanded, and to corrected some point of view, It is also the firstpart of this content,ie, described the object of study and scope, significance, researchreview and a description of research ideas.Chapter2mainly focus on the formation of "P is P,Q". Specificallyspeaking,(1)whether we can add adv. right before.(2)the item number of "P is P".(3)part of speech which we take the place of P.(4)the semantic relationship of several "Pis P".(5)the semantic relationship of "P is P" and Q.(6)the semantic relocation of "is"in the phrase “P is P”.(7)The influence caused by the adv. which right before "is" Inthis chapter,we explain the "is" is judge.In the third chapter, we study the statement that "P is P "and "Q" constitute the isbearing relationship. The position of "P" is for more nouns, pronouns, quantifiers, thenouns is very more, the adverbs is in front of the "is”, This chapter analysis the mainpoint is how "P is P" and "Q" to conduct effective connection and mechanism of thelistener’s understanding of this sentence. This chapter, we have the class with thecategories of statements, her are three categories. Put forward the mechanism of theformation and understanding about the statement type through connotation meaningand accessibility. Meanwhile, we distinguish between two types of sentences throughthe connotation from the "Q", From the narrow point of view, the statement is not the“P is P,Q”,if the "Q" is conceptual meaning.In the forth chapter, we research the transforming statements of "P is P,Q" under the framework of the reply. Put forward the positive and negative relationship, it fits apattern of "trigger-response” and it is with the utility of politeness. In addition to, weput two questions, one of them is quantifiers is play o role of devaluate with thecombination of full text analysis.In the fifth chapter, the avers that in the front of "is" are analyzed in detail.Through the examples, we have a further understanding about adverb syntaxconditionality. On this basis, we analyzed the mechanism of the adverbs can beincorporated into the statement and their effectiveness. We think the reason is theadverb semantics cottesponds to the statement, meanwhile, we find that adverbs tohighlight to express views means of grammaticalization.Finally, we summarized the full text and the focus and innovate of this text willbe summarized. Meanwhile, we will point out the problem that fail to solve,putsforward author’s preliminary understanding.
Keywords/Search Tags:Tautology, Succession, Adversation, Adverbs
PDF Full Text Request
Related items