On The Autonomy Of Art In The Background Of Modernity

Abstract: During the20th century, modern research into the Western academic"learning" is one of the art of self-discipline, due to living in the modern study of thefocus position, it is of concern as a "school of learning in school. The art ofself-discipline of this article will be placed in the context of modernity, trying toclearance of the basic problem.Close relationship exists between modernity and the art of self-discipline, this linkis rather to be regarded as an abnormal parent-child relationship. In particular, thecharacteristics of the modern sexual differentiation requirements of modern art used tobe pulled out of the unified paradigm of modern society, self-contained;, modern art ofself-discipline of forming the necessary material base and ideological foundation; moreimportant yes, the modernity of the demands of the art of self-regulation implies arational out of control again and orderly rule of the state’s secular world. Self-disciplineart as a modern concept in the modern context as an academic issue, is the specificcharacterization of the spirit of modernity at the cultural level, is the inevitablerequirement of the modern cultural mission.The general spirit of modernity in the art of self-discipline concept is refined, ismainly characterized by the following three aspects of the value proposition of the art ofself-discipline, the goal of self-discipline of art and artistic self-regulation of thecontradictions, the value proposition of the art of self-regulation reflects the modern artis different from the traditional art of modern sexuality, including: border programlegislation, reject mediocrity, and the construction of three levels of elite consciousness;art of self-discipline objectives reflect the modern mission of modern art to bear,including the critique of alienation and social, emotional individual re-affirmed the andthree levels of aesthetic salvation; self-regulation of the contradictions of the art is thereproduction of modernity inherent contradiction at the cultural level, in the case ofcontradiction between refined three nodes: the affirmation and negation, the elite andthe general public, art and self-discipline and bourgeois consciousness form. Concludedthat: the advent of the Modern Context-based art of self-discipline, not only embodiesthe overall spirit of modernity, also inevitably inherited the various paradox ofmodernity, so that is always in a vague and ambiguous.The art of self-discipline as the general spirit of modernity at the cultural level ofcharacterization, is bound to have a huge impact, in the case of impact is not onlyreflected in the specific level of artistic creation, including the promotion of theformation of the concept of modern art, creative approach and the new school of art isalso reflected in social and cultural level, including public enlightenment and criticismmaterialized civilization; However, with the historical process of entering into the post-modern society, art and self-discipline as a revolution "in the" den also sufferingfrom the modern theorists critique and face enormous difficulties in the consumercontext, the predicament is reflected in two aspects: the context of modern society, theart of self-discipline after digestion as well as the prevalence of the concept of "End ofArt" Art will go.The final conclusion of this paper are: First, the art of self-discipline as a modernconcept, its origins in the Modern Context is the inevitable result of the pursuit by thespirit of modernity; Second, the entire modern history, is considered aestheticmodernity the core provisions of the fight against social modernity, burdened with theheavy responsibility of the "aesthetic salvation, however, who are charged with theattributes of modernity inherent contradictions, cause its very nature can not be regardedas a homogeneous unified whole, destined not to complete this task;Again, in the newconsumer context, the art of self-discipline facing unprecedented difficulties to besolved.