| As one of the Chinese culture" classics", the" Book of Songs" in the historicaldimension plays multiple roles of culture: it is not only a bright pearl in our countrypoetry art treasure-house, a cultural and musical synthesizer, but as the "politicalethics textbook" in our country long feudal society, become the spirit of the Chinesenational culture theory of land.The305poems originally were collected from folk by musical officials in ZhouDynasty from Eleventh Century B.C. to sixth century B.C., was not just be used forsacrifices, ritual and great song. Legend has it that in the spring and Autumn PeriodConfucius compiled and collated it as teaching materials, and explored the" Xing,view, group, hatred" of the social education function. The " Book of Songs" by theoriginal poetry and the top of the "classic" Procession, become tender and gentlesentiment and training Confucian political ethics education tools. After that during the"Book of Songs," and explain it, forming the present a splendid sight stretches far."Book of songs" research projects.As an important constituent of the Chinese" book of songs" study, thetraditional" book of songs" experienced Sinology, Song and new Chinesecharacteristics different stages, shown the clearly stage characteristics from the heavyexegetical in Han Dynasty, learning to justice in Song Dynasty, to heavy criticismtheory in Qing Dynasty. The "book of songs" interpretation of their respective basedon age stream, is significantly different. But the traditional" book of songs" as theimportant branch of traditional Chinese classics, not only focus on its variouscharacteristics of the different stages, and inevitably maintain its "born" in the internalconsistency, it is a traditional classics studies horizon interpretation under theguidance of the Book of Songs, the longing of it, make it become the maintenance inChinese feudal orthodox "political bodied".In two thousand years of traditional" book of songs" study process. Han, Song"Book of songs" histological differences are an important topic in academic circles disputes so far. Due to the different requirements of development of the times, Han,song" book of songs" in the interpretation process has many differences, which causeddisputes unceasingly, and even generated formidable "bad account book", and theconflict is intuitively reflected in the fields of studying the" book of songs"." The"Mao Zhuan" made in Han Dynasty is first interpretation on "the book of songs"learning field, also is the earliest extantly complete interpretation, together with the"Mao Xu" become authority on the" book of songs" learning in Han Dynasty, buildinga unique interpretation of the "book of songs"." Shi Ji Zhuan" wrote by Zhu Xi forthe "Book of Songs" is outstanding representative in Song Dynasty, which is thepopular authoritative biography. It makes the advent of the traditional " The book ofsongs" field face a major transition. This article is based on the differences whichmade by the interpretation on the Han and Song "the book of songs" learning, makesthe "Mao Zhuan"and "Shi Ji Zhuan" as the representative of the Han and Songlearning, investigates the two in Han and Song learning background, based on thedifferent attitudes of "Mao Xu" and " Xing", explained the difference of character oftext interpretation ambiguity as the breakthrough point, announce two differentreleasing" the book of songs" path, among them to focus on the different attitudes to"Mao Xu"," exploring the inheritance and stripping process of "Shi Ji Zhuan", finallyto brush the methodology principle difference between "Mao Zhuan" and "Shi JiZhuan", trying to all-round, multi-level new perspective of the existing currentacademic single contrast model. To make clear the difference between two, at thesame time, face up to its interior not allow to ignore consistency of the dialectical,historical perspective to give "Mao Zhuan" and "Shi Ji Zhuan" objective and fairassessment. |
PDF Full Text Request