| Based on the linguistics theory, specifically the use ofconversation analysis theoretical study, under "interview with YangLan"between Yang Lan and invited guests, the paper is trying toexplain Pragmatic Perspective session for structural analysis,combined with the session process of the characteristics of thelinguistic. These linguistic symbols come from the vocabulary,grammar, voice and so on. During the analysis of these symbols, weexplore a more detailed study of the nature and laws of the sessionactivities, and then we will further explore the style of Yang Lanreflected in the session. At the same time, we will focus on the host oflanguage use and choice of intrinsic motivation ,so as to makereasons for the reasonable analysis and interpretation.Discusses of the thesis consist of three modules:Part I: We apply of conversation analysis theory to describe thestructure of Yang Lan interview session. We will describe in two ways :First , describe the overall structure, the beginning, the process andthe end of the"Interview with Yang Lan" between Yang Lan andguests, in order to generalize her unique characteristics of the overallstructure; Secondly, make the partial description of the sessionstructure,mainly through dialogue turn and enthusiasm these two elements to research, and research how the turn converts deeplywithout losing enthusiasm. We will make the objective interpretationof the phenomenon .Part II: We will apply of the conversation analysis theory,combined with the grammar, phonetics, lexicology, rhetoric theory tostudy the characteristics of Yang Lan and guests conversationallanguage, regarding the examples as the basis: highlighting thequestion sentences in grammar, attending the use of logic accentvoice on the spoken word in the vocabulary and buzzwords, using veryexciting sentence in rhetorically.Part III: In the third part, we will explore the style of YangLan ,which is compatible with production of the program philosophy.Through "Interview with Yang Lan", we find that she asks thequestions at a moderate in the rich deep, rational and emotionalpavilions, and discusses the areas of expertise and confrontation andcollision problems of life with successful people. In addition, she isable to dig out the respondents true and deep thought, makeideological dialogue with respondents equally and stimulate interestin the conversation of the respondents. It is more important that shehas a strong human care , without losing the warmth of human nature. |