A Study On Fiction Controversy In The Era Of "Seventeen Years"

In the era of "Seventeen Years", "fiction controversy" and "the ambiguity"of "politics" make anybody who ignores any "political" penetration of the research literature seems funny. But what does the "political" mean in the "Seventeen Years",or in what way is the periodical characters expressed? How does it affect the "controversy"at that time and participate in the construction of the order of literature? Is there a staggered compromise? Based on this thinking, the writer believes that the "Seventeen Years"and "fiction controversy" needs an open research of "intersexuality"; that it is necessary to go deep into "debate" the complex inner world of the text, and take note of its emotional, aesthetic and ambiguity character, while it must jump out of the text, openly put it in a specific "historical context" to analyze. This enables us to study only a little less arbitrary, more texture and real sense of history.This thesis, aiming at studying "Seventeen Years" period of "novel argument" for the study, outlining through the "case" study and "key words", with "political culture"as the starting point, exploring the "history of the hinterland", trying to show "Argument"and "process"and"detail", and then tap its power and knowledge generated by (writers and critics) in the face of "national state"and"imagination"and"differences"in order to highlight the "difficulties" and "purity" of Seventeen Years'"Fiction Controversy ".