A Comparative Study On The Characteristics Of Attack Technique Of Chinese And Foreign Elite Posts

With the evolution of modern basketball sport, the offensive and defensive combat becomes more and more fierce. Especially the comprehensive defense technology makes athletes physical contact more frequently. Traditional passive follow defense has become history. Instead, strong aggressive defense, also kno wn as pressing defense becomes popular. Between foul and reasonable confront ation, this defense presents an all-round three-dimensional defense feature. “No physical contact” is just a kind of theory. Physical confrontation of post player s is the most frequent and intense in basketball game. By watching the video of 30 th London Olympic Games and determining research object through playe r efficiency value(PER), this study aims to analyzing the pressing offensive te chnology of Chinese and foreign good post players deeply to summarize some discipline. Through finding the differences on application characteristics betwee n post players from Chinese Men’s Basketball and foreign basketball men, and analyzing the reasons, this study provides scientific and comprehensive theoret ical basis and practical references to enhance Chinese basketball players’ ability.By using literature data method, video observation, comparative research m ethod, mathematical statistics, logical analysis, and other research methods, this study conducts a quantitative and qualitative analysis and research on the usin g characteristics of pressing offense between Chinese and foreign good post pla yers. It is shown that:1.There is no big difference on some rigid indexes, like height, weight, etc. between post players from China and those from world strong teams. In fact, Chinese post players are even more superior. In terms of age, Chinese post players are younger than those from world strong teams. While the Quetelet index shows the confrontation ability of Chinese players is a little worse than their opponents.2. From the contrast of holding-ball pressing offensive technology, we see that there doesn’t exist significant difference on the offensive times between Chinese post players and those from world strong teams. While for pressing offense, there exist obvious physical confrontation disadvantages and large gap with our opponents. As for physical confrontation, Chinese post players’ passive confrontation times are more than active ones; on the contrary, world strong teams tend to active confrontation.3. In the process of physical confrontation, our Chinese post players are very different from opponents on the use of body parts; especially the use of upper limbs and trunk still needs further rationalization. We should combine our own advantages to play a bigger role. And in the process of holding-ball pressing offense, there is no big difference between Chinese players and their opponents on bodies of foul.4. It can be seen in the application form contrast of holding-ball pressing offense that our Chinese players tend to choose dribbling as confrontation, which reflects Chinese post players don’t choose direct offense. While post players from world strong teams tend to choose direct confrontation. There is no obvious difference between our post players and their opponents on the use of stride and body turn.5. From the application quality contrast of holding-ball pressing offense, we can see that although the shooting quality of our post players is worse than opponents, there is no large difference; in passing process, with bad passing quality and low threat, Chinese post players is obviously different from their opponents on assisting teammates score. In terms of holding-ball breakthrough, Chinese post players cannot choose time accurately, and their center of body weight is high, therefore there exists a big gap with post player from world strong teams on the breakthrough success rate. And there is no big difference on some data indicators, like offensive foul and offensive mistakes, etc.