Our world-class universities building is mainly in the foundation of "985 Project", since the late 1990s, after ten years of development, China has made significant progress in the process of building world-class universities.Combined with our universities in the five rankings:Academic Ranking of World Universities, QS World University Rankings, THE World University Rankings, Leiden university rankings, Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities and Spanish Webometrics Ranking of World Universities, the performance of previous years can be seen that, the number of universities in the rankings has increased year by year, overall ranking and each individual indicators ranking chart increased year by year, some universities have always ranked among the ranks of the top 100, the individual indicators rank among the ranks of some universities are already in the top 20. However, in the overall ranking, our universities are mainly concentrated in the last paragraph of the rankings, the top 100, top 200, top 300 account for a small proportion, the top 400 and top 500 account for a large proportion. So far our country has no one university among the top 20, and no one in six world university rankings at the same time among the top 100; on each individual indicators ranking, Chinese universities only reflect on the scale of indicators of outstanding performance, but reflect poorly on the quality indicators.Compared with the world first-class universities, there is a large gap between Chinese universities and them. In research quality, only reflects our university research productivity PUB, the P, the number of papers in the recent eleven years, the number of papers nearly a year and other four indicators outstanding, reflecting the influence of scientific citations, research, MCS, MNCS, PP10%, nearly 11 years the number of papers cited in recent years the number of papers cited, over the past year, the average number of citations papers, academic reputation, Citations per faculty, each series of ten indicators that reflect the industry’s source of income for research collaboration force, PP (collab), PP (int collab), PP (ui collab), PP (<100km), PP (>1000km) and other six indicators, and to reflect scientific excellence of N&S, h-index in recent years, high-being the number of articles on the lead, high quality and number four indicators papers poor performance, the problem of poor research and innovation performance, the lack of high-level scientific research, cross-border, cross-agency research collaboration is poor; On the quality of education, our university graduates only reflect the quality of the employer reputation for outstanding performance indicators, but reflect the quality of teachers Award, HiCi, PCP, teaching the four indicators that reflect the quality of the students Alumni indicators, as well as teachers and students to reflect the teacher-student ratio than the poor performance on the indicators, the main problem is lack of high-level performance of teachers, teacher-student ratio is too low; in the international level, in the three indicators of international faculty ratio, international students ratio and international, and only Peking University and Tsinghua University, the performance is more excellent performance of the main problems for the internal level of internationalization of Chinese University disparities; at the network level, in the presence of Chinese universities (Presence), the influence (Impact) and excellence (Excellence) three indicators performance are relatively good, but the universities in our country in open (Openness) index performs worse, the main problem is the lack of network openness.The construction of the world first-class university is not accomplish at one stroke, in order to reduce our country’s University and the University of world class gap, based on the view of world university rankings, you can start from the following aspects:firstly, accurately positioning, formulate strategic development planning and reasonable; secondly, to enhance the capability of independent innovation, improve the scientific influence; third, strengthen cooperation in research cross domain and cross organization; thirdly, establish a group of high-level teaching staff; once again, to improve the level of internationalization of university; finally, strengthen the network construction, improve the open university. |