| "Mathematics is the mother of science", mathematics is useful and natural. For High school students, learning mathematics is not only in response to college entrance examination, but to learn to "useful mathematics." Therefore, as mathematics educators, it is necessary to stimulate the enthusiasm of students to study mathematics, develop their own capacity to explore the mathematical problem, but the main way to high school students to learn mathematics is to refer to high school mathematics textbooks.Along with the deepening of the new curriculum reform, curriculum materials have entered the sixth year of experiment. According to "New Curriculum Standard" to prepare teaching materials in mathematics, there are six sets of tests, including five sets which had entered into the national basic curriculum reform pilot area for high school students. The current experimental teaching materials for novelty has gradually faded over the years. Both in theory and in practice. both the curriculum standards and materials raised many questions, which are more controversial problems. What choice of which version of the high school mathematics textbooks can better play the test materials in teaching the important role of resources? Which material is more consistent with, and close to the "New Curriculum" requirements, More conducive to the development of students? For the different versions of textbooks can learn from each other? Front-line teachers in actual teaching of how to grasp?Based on this, this article compares the commonalities and differences of A, B version in materials, dealing with the two parts. First, for a detailed comparison and research,into A, B version of the new materials (obligatory one) found the similarities and differences between two versions of mathematics textbooks, and refer to first-line teachers'cases, summed up advantages and disadvantages of the two versions of material. Found in the comparison: two editions of the textbooks in the teaching objectives, course content, preparation style, Example and Exercise and have some differences. Second, interviewed the first-line teachers who are engaged in teaching A, B version. Combined with itself and a number of front-line teachers, classroom teaching experience, teaching materials for the preparation of two editions of comments and suggestions. this paper uses comparative law, literature, law, statistical analysis, questionnaire survey, interviews and other research methods. |
