On The Legitimacy Of Gambling Agreement

Agreement on gambling as a new investment vehicle, with venture capital and private equity funds and gradually rise in the country’s well known for. But too often accompanies a huge controversy, one side is an important tool to make up for the investment and financing both sides of asymmetric information on the gambling agreement on risk aversion plays an important role. The other side is due to the laws of their country regulation ineffective, resulting in an agreement on gambling because of disputes arising frequently staged. Faced with such a thorny issue, how should our response in the legislative and judicial. Is in the end a ban or regulate the boot, is to continue with the traditional thinking to deal with civil and commercial matters, or in Supreme People’s Court on the "Admiralty investment v Gansu Shi Heng case" retrial verdict made this a good opportunity to show our judiciary is willing to admit the legitimacy of gambling agreement, but should adapt them to the wishes of the domestic market environment.Based on the above background, this paper proposes a new way to bet on a reasonable standard protocol: Through analysis and comparison of the risks of gambling under the burden of both investment and financing agreements and revenue possibilities contrary to the principle of capital maintenance concerns, then it could be resolved by means of reinforced concrete information disclosure system.