The Value Of The People Of Our Country's Jury System To Achieve And Improve

The jury system began in Roman times, the development of the Middle Ages in Europe, introduced into China in the Qing Dynasty. China's people's jury system in China has experienced a tortuous development process, from the late Qing Dynasty until the present, the system of waste in the years between the value and status of legislation only gradually revealed. This value mainly in six areas:the democratic values of justice, the value of judicial impartiality, judicial supervision of the value, the value of judicial independence, judicial authority of the value, the value of legal education and advocacy.The value of the realization of the jury system also has two sides, both the system and improve the positive progress achieved, there are shortcomings and deficiencies of the passive system implementation. The positive value of the jury system to achieve performance in the selection of the jury' s broad and has strong representation and participation of the trial participants face trial rate has gradually increased; the jury of the produced specifications, strict management; people's assessors assessor improve the credibility of the court case; the jury in the trial of independent thinking, rational law enforcement; the jury increasingly robust training and other incentives. Since the legal culture and the reasons for defects existing legislation, the jury system to achieve the value of some negative factors exist, the concentrated expression of the material guarantee for the absence of the jury, the trial rate of participation needs to be improved, lack the breadth of people's jurors, the People's Jury Members participate in the trial of the significance of lack of knowledge, some jurors perform their duties is not strong, the parties take the initiative to arrange the jury of the very few applications.The jury system as an important political and judicial systems, in order to get full value, we must improve the jury system legislation, jury management agency unified, standardized application of the case the jury, the jury clearly the rights and obligations, the establishment of monitoring mechanisms the jury to work to adjust the jury's selection of conditions, standardize procedures for the jury to inform and improve the social status of people's assessors.