Korea In The City State Of The World Novel Study - Pu Wanxu "wandering In The Afternoon And Qiu Huadong's" Flower Flower "

Make a general compare of Korea's and China's literature, we can see that the influence research field between ancient literature had already make a great achievement, also in recent years around the morden times representative writer, Korea's and China's neoteric literature in launch and deepen it's contrast, but the contrast research of Contemporary Literature is still at the starting stage. Two countries haven't compared S. Korea's and China's Contemporary Literature and sumed up its similar and difference research results so far.this Thesis try to analyse Qiu hua dong's city novel masterpiece of" flower in flower " and Piao wan xu's city novel masterpiece " stray in afternoon". Two works both around the city and the relation of city mankind, describe the people who are corrde by juju doctrine and mammonism. and criticize sharply the materialism values and marriage view. Compareing and analysing these two works, sum up the similars, differences and causes between them, thus probing into the connection between the Korea's and China's literature characteristic of city novel.at first let us carry on the contrast to the social historical backgrounds of two countries about the novel masterpiece" flower in flower " and " stray in afternoon". This Social historical comparativeanalysis mainly through analyse the modernization drive in the seventiesSeoul and city characteristic of Beijing in the 1990s. As the capital of twocountries, Seoul and Beijing are the key areas of modernizations of Chinaand Korea. As the representativeness space of times of materialization, abig characteristic demonstrated in Seoul and Beijing is " the colonizingand melting of living space", namely the economic activity occupies thecentre position of life, status of money replace status of political right inthe past, become most effective measure of value and regulating measureof the life. Because of the incongruous development of the material andspirit, such values which is going to the extremes as " the material isomnipotent ", " mammonism " , " egoism " and so onare fill in the air ofthe society.Secondly, from the comparative analysis personality of stray in afternoon"and" flower in flower", we can sum up the personalities^ similar and difference and the reason formed. Chu ji and Zhou jin, as the two protagonist of works, they both hold the same materialism values and marriage view, they both regard marriage as the means to obtain more materials and improve their status, and this marriage can comes from beauty with the human body. Chu ji and Ji zhou, as the model of the hollow people in the city, become lost the ability of criticize.Moreover, analysing the similarities and differences of the characteristics writing of "flower in flower " and "stray in afternoon",Two space-time of works constructs to be " now, here " mode. Through telling citizens' daily trival matters, the writer represent the ways of life of contemporary city. Both the two works stand on the narration visual of the third angle of a person, criticize and satirizethe city people's values and life attitude that is distorted by material. But Qiu hua dong only single satire to personage, Piao wan xu display attitude that not just satirize but take pity on the personage, It is more powerfull than the single satire.Researching "Stray in afternoon" and "flower in flower", oneside it makes the literature research get rid of the localization of one country, another side it grounds in later urban fiction research of Korea and China. At the same time, this study which pays the attention to the modern course of Korea and China, can make us understand the normal literary law of "Literature reflects the real life".