On The Retro Retro And Literature

"Returning to the ancients" is an old and usual question. In the history of Chinese literature, Returning to the ancients has happened many times and there were lots of argues between "Returning to the ancients" and "revolution". Because of the reform of the sociality and times, the argue about "Returning to the ancients" was very particular which happened between Guo Shaoyu and Qian Zhongshu in 1934.This article will begin with this argue, and then reach each aspects of "Returning to the ancients". This article has four parts. The first part will introduce the argue between Qian and Guo,I will reach the otherness of their literature concepts,ideas of evolution theory and how they conducts "Returning to the ancients"; The second part I will talk about in the interchange of Chinese and foreign culture how "Returning to the ancients" and "Returning to the ancients of literature" find out the way of themselves. How does the word group ---"Returning to the ancients of literature" spread from the western and Japanese to China? Which elements about "Returning to the ancients of literature" exist in the Chinese ancient culture? What's more, there were five views about "Returning to ancients" in the past time. The third part:"Returning to ancients of Chinese literature" has many special aspects, I will research its special elements and want to find the reason that causes the special. The last part,I will relation the nowadays tide about "Returning to ancients", then to look for a way for "Returning to ancients". I agree with Qian Zhongshu's viewpoint:"Returning to ancients" is just a form of revolution and "the ancients" is just a tool. We shouldn't treat it precisely or relegate. There is relevance between the "Returning to ancients" and politics,economic,national culture and character. It's positive to threat "Returning to the ancients" tolerantly and patulous. The research about theory targets at acting on the reality, I hope that my article can reach it.