Finberg Technical Way Of Thinking Of Critical Theory

Andrew Feenberg is not a complexity sciences researcher, and in his works there is not any complexity sciences paradigm term appeared. But the author of this article find that in his "critical theory of technology", Feenberg used the complexity sciences paradigm basic principles summarized by later complexity sciences researchers unconsciously. The research content of this article is mainly focus on following several aspects:1, Elaborating the difference of methodology between Feenberg's critical theory of technology and the past philosophy of technology theory.2, Analysing the basic thinking methods of humankind. Outlining the brief course of attaching importance to and ignoring the simplicity and complexity thinking methods, and the basic present state of complexity sciences.3, proving how did Andrew Feenberg use complexity thinking methods in his critical theory of technology unconsciously.4, The revelation got from Feenberg's methodology used in his critical theory of technology to present philosophy of technology, complexity sciences, simplicity and complexity and the basic thinking methods of humankind.The logical jumping-off point of this article, Feenberg use complexity thinking methods unconsciously, is a private judgement judged by the author of this article. Except the academic level limit of this author himself philosophy of technology itself is a younger subject than philosophy of sciences and what is more, complexity sciences still lies in fore paradigm stage of the subject. Therefore except for the shortcoming and mistake is unavoidable the subject can be discussed is too many. Hoping to provide some revelation for philosophy of technology and complexity sciences, the article made a methodology research in Feenberg's critical theory of technology through a unique perspective.