| The problem about comprehensive management and separated management of finance isalways the center of exploring in the country and out of the country. Currently, an importanttendency in the development of international finance is the convertion from separatedmanagement to comprehensive management. England, Japan and America carried outfinancial reforming one after another. They allowed the finance to manage out of the trade.The finance of our country is also separated management now. Under the tendency ofinternational development, it is an important realistic problem to our country that to persistingin separated management continue or to put comprehensive management in to practice, andmix ourselves in the wholly economy and worldly finance. From analysis our country'sobjective situation, author considers that we have the condition of practicing comprehensivemanagement, and practicing comprehensive management is necessarily, acceptably andinevitably. At the same time, to analyze the concrete pattern of comprehensive management,and then author puts forward financial holding group to be our country's realistic choice.The full text divides into four parts.Part one, sum up the basic meaning of comprehensive management and separatedmanagement, and compare the advantage and disadvantage of comprehensive managementand separated management.Part two, from analyzing our country's situation, author exclaims that practicingcomprehensive management is necessary, acceptable and inevitable to the finance of ourcountry.Part three, compare the three international popular concrete pattern of comprehensivemanagement with the existed comprehensive management in our country, to get theircharacters.Part four, from the forward three parts discussion, to confirm financial holding group isfit for the comprehensive pattern of our country's finance, and put forward constructiveopinions according to specific analysis in concrete problems on banks, securities andinsurance of our country. |
PDF Full Text Request