An Analysis Of The International Day Of The Law Of The Sea In The Arctic Day

As the world is gradually moving into the ocean era and other countries pay moreattention to the Marine resources, conflicts between the coastal state and theright-owned countries is increasingly obvious. Since International Tribunal for theLaw of the Sea was founded in1996, the main appeal of cases it has jurisdiction overare prompt release. In addition, five cases involvesprovisional measures procedure. Inrecent years, we usually hear that Chinese fishing boats were in custody andfishermen were caught. The south China sea dispute between China and thePhilippines also has aroused the concern of the world.This thesis is based on the No.22case of the International Tribunal for the Lawof the Sea, which has summarized the acceptance of International Tribunal for theLaw of the Sea and the arbitration tribunal. The case analysis of the thesis mainlyrelates to the practices of court and the arbitration tribunal in these three aspects ofjurisdiction, provisional measures and prompt release. The thesis pointed out that thepractice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea are mainly linked with aseries of procedural matters. In the mandatory arbitration of the Philippines againstChina, our country can put forward a precondition to maintain our interest accordingto the practices of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and arbitration court.This thesis used the method of case analysis to analyze and interpreting the No.22case of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and arbitration court, andsummarized the demonstration effect based on the development of "the ArcticSunrise" case for handling the south China sea issue, which leaded us to safeguard theinterest of our country by using the international dispute settlement mechanism.