Criticism Of Western Marxist View Of Practice

Practice is the important and basic point of Marxist philosophy. Practice is used widely in daily life. With the development of economy times, we couldn’t live without practice. Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. We need to verify our theory through practice significance whether it is correct、 reasonable and feasible. The practice live up the Marxist philosophy to a new height. At the same time, it is imperative to study the practice of the Marxist philosophy is.The Western Marxism belongs to a part of Marxism. The Western Marxism was also in research with practice. But it’s very different between them. It is important for Western Marxist practice on what kind of attitude. Then the Criticism of the western Marxist practice was produced at that moment. What are the differences and similarities between the practice of Marxism and the Western Marxism should be a research object. We will contrast with advantage and disadvantage of the Western Marxism of practice in this article.This article mainly from three parts to discuss: Firstly, elaborate the representative of the Western Marxism practice of the main idea. This paper chose three representative person of the Western Marxism practice: Lucas、 Grams and Marcuse, make a briefly point of view. Secondly, contrast with the three Western Marxist philosopher’s point of view. This paper is to contrast the Lucas and Marcuse’s viewpoint with the Marx’s alienation, and also made an analyse between Gramsci’s practical philosophy and the Marx’s theory of practice. Thirdly, I give a evaluation of the western Marxism practice in this article. The Western Marxism practice view give a great contributions to the Marxist, but we can’t neglect the limit of the partice of the Western Marxism.