Comparison Between Left - Behind Children And Migrant Children

Left-behind children and migrant children are disadvantaged children two representative groups, their physical and mental health and development concern for the community, and the academic tradition of research perspectives are concerned about their psychological and behavioral problems. This study was to explore the resilience of children at the sight of positive psychology, and in gratitude for the positive psychological traits as the content quality of the research that children’s resilience and gratitude traits will affect the development of their social nature to some extent. Based on this, this study of left-behind children and non-left-behind children, migrant children and non-migrant children, left-behind children and migrant children as the research object, analysis to gauge the difference between them qualities of resilience and gratitude to the differences between the experimental analysis of their social development. On this basis, further analysis of the predictive power of the left-behind children and migrant children liquidity resilience and gratitude to their social development.This research adopts the "Youth Mental Resilience Scale" and the "Adolescent Gratitude Scale"(AGS) to investigate 30 left-behind children and 30 non-left-behind children of 2 junior high school in Anqing city, Anhui province, and 30 migrant children and 30 non-migrant children of 3 junior high school in Wuxi city, Jiangsu province. And use aggressive behavior experiment, altruistic behavior experiment, dilemma problem solving and emotion recognition experiment to study of their social development. Idependent samples T-test, analysis of variance and regression analysis, the difference of these categories of children. Finally, further analysis of the predictive power of left-behind children and migrant children’s resilience and gratitude to their social development, the following conclusions:(1) Left-behind children of gratitude level below the level of non-left-behind children of gratitude, "grace expression and return to society" is higher than non-left-behind children; Will quality of decisiveness is lower than the non-left-behind children; Social emotions and the development of social cognition is better than that of non-left-behind children; Resilience, aggression and altruism overall level difference is not significant. Generally speaking, the "left-behind" experience certain unfavorable effects on the children.(2) The overall level of resilience of migrant children higher than non-migrant children, "emotional control" ability higher than non-migrant children; Altruism better than non-migrant children; Willpower decisively lower than non-migrant children; social emotional and social development of cognitive lower than non-migrant children; Gratitude and violations of the overall level of the difference was not significant. Overall, the "flow" experience for children also had some negative impact.(3) Left-behind children’s resilience and gratitude level is lower than that of migrant children,” the social grace of expression and returns" higher than migrant children, "the grace of others and return" less than migrant children; Willpower decisively lower than migrant children; social emotional and social cognitive development higher than migrant children; overall difference violations and altruistic behavior is not significant. Overall, the "Left" and "flow" experiences have had a negative impact on children of different aspects and different degrees, but considering that "flow" of the negative effects is lower than "stay." In other words, when faced with "Left" or "flow" dilemma, the latter is the better choice; the author also suggests that parents under conditions permitting try to turn "left" to "flow."(4) Left-behind children and migrant children’s resilience and gratitude combined effect of the violations; there is a linear relationship between resilience and violations, and resilience can be significantly positively predicted violations; there is a linear relationship between resilience and Willpower’s decisiveness, and resilience can be significantly positively predicted Willpower’s decisiveness; high and low levels of resilience to social emotional and social cognition predict significant differences, such as increased resilience predictive power level increases, which have large amplitude level with resilience from low to high and gradually decreases; low levels of gratitude for social emotional and social cognition predictive power is significantly greater than moderate level of predictive power of gratitude, such as the predictive power of gratitude from low to high level presentation "V" shaped rebound trend, the critical point for the moderate level of gratitude.