Research On Emotional Vocabulary Processing Preferences And Emotional Performance Of Middle School Students With Different Mental Elasticity Levels

The mental resilience refers to the individual face of adversity, trauma, tragedy,threats or other material pressure the good adaptation process, as the individualdifficulties experienced capacity to rebound. With the establishment of the emotionalcomponent of the deepening of the study of mental resilience, mental flexibility andemotional characteristics of emotional information processing is increasinglybecoming the focus of the study. From the psychological resilience of emotional thelexical processing preferences and emotional performance characteristics of the studystart, junior high school students for the study, an attempt to reveal the characteristicsof different psychological resilience Students expressions of emotion and emotionalword processing preference characteristics, in order to cultivate their psychologicalflexibility, counseling and psychological intervention to find a breakthrough andbasis.This study on the basis of previous studies of emotional word processing,randomly selected sample of100individuals to be assessed Institute of emotionalvocabulary materials; by stratified cluster sampling method360junior high schoolstudents in a secondary school effective mental resilience individual,64subjects;experimental paradigm Junior high school students of different mental resilience(High group31, low group33) in the emotional vocabulary discrimination taskshowed initial emotional information processing preferences characteristics of testcheck, and differences in comparison; an effective psychological elastic individualemotional expression characteristics measurement, to discuss the results of the studybefore combining the emotional word processing preferences junior high schoolstudents emotional word processing preferences of different mental flexibility andemotional performance characteristics.The conclusions of this study are as follows:(1) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, a positive perception of the low group emotional cognitive, emotional control, there are significant differences. Highpsychological flexibility grouped positive cognitive and emotional control wassignificantly higher than the psychological resilience low group.(2) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet emotionalpsychological experience objective social support awareness of the total resources ofthe community to support the existence of significant differences. High psychologicalflexibility grouped objective social support awareness, significantly higher than thetotal amount of social support resources psychological resilience low group.(3) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet emotionalbehavioral responses to actively respond to the tendency there are significantdifferences. Psychological flexibility high packet tendency to actively respond topsychological resilience was significantly higher than the low group.(4) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet mental flexibilitywas emotional vocabulary recognition task reaction time and accuracy rate weresignificantly different. Psychological resilience and low grades groups have shownpositive emotions vocabulary optimal processing preferences, high packet processingbias, followed by the level of negative emotional vocabulary, low packet processingbias neutral emotional vocabulary.(5) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet mental flexibilitytest positive emotional vocabulary recognition task reaction time and accuracy ratethere are no significant differences.(6) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet mental flexibilitywas neutral emotional vocabulary recognition task reaction time and accuracy ratewere significantly different. The mental resilience low grouping neutral emotionalidentification significantly due to the high group.(7) The mental resilience high elasticity grouping, the low packet mental flexibilitytest negative emotional vocabulary recognition task reaction time and there was nosignificant difference in accuracy rate.The study also insufficient sample size and the use of information processingmeans of research is still insufficient, irrelevant variable control is not strict enough tobe desired, you need to receive attention in subsequent research and improve.