The Analysis On Realizes Condition In Asset Social Policies

1991, in the United States Center for Social Development at Washington University, Professor Michael Proposed an asset-based social policy at the first time in its board of the"the assets and the poor". Asset-core base of social policy and theory, asset accumulation and stressed the significance of the building, that help the poor asset accumulation and investment rather than simple direct increase their income and consumption. It subverted the traditional social policies which based income and create a new research paradigm. Against this, scholars have begun to study the theory, the United States and other countries in the practice areas have also taken action. China's social policy researchers in the field of academics and also gave a positive response to the study.Assets means the core of social policy is to promote the creation of individual accounts, increased accumulation of personal assets and construction, so that the real poor out of poverty, in the economic and psychosocial genuine independence and development. Assets of social policy in theory imagine the value of a valuable and far-reaching significance, in the reality field, in the context of China's national conditions, if it can be applied and implemented, this requires us to consider. And this is precisely this in mind, the social policies of assets in the realization of China's conditions.In the introduction I made a general policy describe in the assets of the community and to the issues on this basis. The first section focuses on the theoretical level, understand and grasp on the relevant knowledge. Asset-based social policy is the basis for revenue to maintain the social policies. The most effective way is the accumulated assets of a person which change his living conditions of future generations. For individuals, first of all, have the same economic effect to the income assets. It is a reflection of spending power, in particular the potential for future consumption more active role. Furthermore, from the psychological point of personal assets have a greater economic effect and the other outside significance. For society, social policy of assets can create responsible citizens. National would more actively into economic construction, and contribute to national and social development. The second section focuses on the practical level, through the"American dream"demonstration project, the British welfare policies - such as the Child Trust Fund assets practical examples to grasp the essence of social policy. Part three is to focus attention to our country, described the minimum subsistence guarantee system and small loans and conduct. At the same time compared with social policies of assets. The last part is the end of the article, is the core part of this paper, which focused on social policy and derived assets in the realization of China's conditions. The author believes that this three main aspects: First, in the capital, in order to enable each of the poor have accumulated assets and establishment of individual accounts for them, the government should have sufficient financial resources as a backup to support it. In addition, it need for the participation of non-governmental organizations. After the reform and opening up,China's non-governmental organizations began rapid development. It played an increasingly important role in the fields of environmental protection, poverty alleviation, education and other to. However, compared international, China's non-governmental organizations have a considerable gap both in quantity and maturity. Between their social status and role of cognitive level is still relatively low. For example, its development is unbalanced, and not standardized, the lack of industry self-regulation, nor a perfect, the system's legal system. All this requires a long-term process of improving. Secondly, under the premise of the government or society provide the distribution of the assets whether participants to accumulate assets that is inclusive social policy issues. In this paper, though the comparing between the China's situation and the United States, found that the living of our people especially the poor population is important in asset accumulation and formation. Improve the living is a very practical prerequisite. Thirdly, it is the capacity of the participants, but also said that participants have accumulated assets of awareness and financial capability. This not only needs the whole community values and the changes in atmosphere, but also raise the overall level of knowledge and the important training. Attributed, the conditions of assets social policy are not mature in China.