| In the millennium, the word steps into a new ages that have characters for knowledge innovation and new technique industrialization, it is a knowledge-based economy ages. The human resource becomes the most important strategy resources for development of a national economy and society. The quality of higher teacheing comes to a decision the quality of the talented students, relate to the nation's advancement and development. The faculties'quality directly comes to a decision the talented quality. Therefore, the evaluation of university's teacher becomes extremely important. All kind of questions in the system of evaluating teacher, and affects the development of university. So, it is necessary to improve and perfect the system of university's teacher appraisal.Firstly, this paper introduces the present situation of evaluation of undergraduate teaching quality; then, base on the particularity of undergraduate teachers, the paper analyzes the characteristics of evaluation, form, period, mention and compares the present ways, selects the suitable way to teacher's performance evaluation in the university. From the foundation of cc university, construe and find the problem of evaluation, set up economy project, the valid index system of evaluation. This paper using analysis hierarchy process (AHP) method, Homogeneous Markov chains analysis method and multi-angle of view's fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to analyzed question. Finally, the paper adverts to some tips as evaluating undergraduate teachers.In the paper, the valid index system of evaluating undergraduate teachers includes 4 main items: teaching, scientific research, the moral qualities, equipment. Under the main items, there are 15 second class items, such as political qualities, ability of teaching etc. In addition, the index of ability of teaching divides into 3 third-classes: the effect of teaching, the method of teaching and the workloads of teaching.In this paper, the weight of each index is determined by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. The AHP method that expresses and process subjective judgment as quantity form, and reflects the whole of object of evaluation, it determines the relative importance of factors in a hierarchy through comparing one factor with another. The paper use Homogeneous Markov chains analysis method appraising the effect of teaching. This method can ignore insignificancy of result of judging and foundation, this method is better than the method that appraisal the effect of teaching using student's scores, because a student's base is different from another's. The labor of teacher has the characteristics of non-computation, creativity, delay, so the appraisal should be comprehensive, complex and fuzzy, this paper uses the method of multi-angle of view's Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.This paper has six parts. The first part presents the purpose and significance, reality about teacher's performance evalution in the university, and presents the topic mention and the article's content, the way of research. The second part is the overview about performance evaluation. Discuss the meaning in intension, obtains communal development of the organization and individual. Function: communication, development, control, prompting. Content: consist of attitude, behavior and result of the work. Method: dvivide into two kinds according to the form of evaluation, quantitative and qualitative. Design type of performance evaluation criterion, principle and steps, the rationale etc. The particularity of the teacher's performance evaluation: does not seek to make profit; the higher of request standard; salary by the price; particularity of service object; proper attention to particularity of social responsibility and school benefit; professional ethics; multiplicity of work's evaluation criterion. Point the suitable way to teacher's performance evaluation in the university, management by objectives; Form, multi-angle of view's comprehensive evaluation (colleagues, students, self-check, organizations), obtain datas using tabulations; Period, fixed period and non-scheduled. The third part introduces three ways which could result question of performance evaluation, the weight of each index is determined by the analytical hierarchy process method, use Homogeneous Markov chains analysis method appraising the effect of teaching, fuzzy synthetic judgement mathematical model. The forth part is the important point of this paper, analyses and find the problem of cc university performance evaluation, establish the evaluation system, effectual index system, compute the scale of performance evaluation index system by the AHP, use Homogeneous Markov chains analysis method appraising the effect of teaching, use the method of multi-angle of view's Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The paper use method evaluates teachers of cc university detailed as an example. The fifth part analyses the occuring question and error probable, and brings forward the measure. The deviation of evaluation criterion, difficulty of evaluate the value of creativity etc, errors of halo effect, subjective prejudice, emotional effect, suggests effect etc. In view of above questions and errors, the measure below may utilize, strengthens the understanding of purpose and significance of performance evaluation, feedback interview could full exert vital action, invites the staff to carry on the self-appraisal, call for relationship of egality and harmonious, persists principle of humanist. The sixth part summarize this paper, point out that it needs to analyse the different of the university when you use the evaluation index, evaluation criterion, scale, point out some shortcomings and development directions in this field.The purpose of the study is building the kind of scientific, operable, effective teacher's performance evaluation index system to improve teacher's performance level in the university matching the strategy of the cc university. The method is significant to settle problems of performance evaluation. |
