The Study Of Modern Folk Rules Of The Social Choice On Not Marrying To The Namesake

It is a long cultural process that the human beings start to refuse to marry to the namesake from mixed inhabitants'being lived and married in the beginning. The process stands for the progress that the human beings have made in terms of human civilization. Considering the effects of family love and the descendants' health, people begin to make it clear that the persons in one family can't marry to each other. And the concept is not only an ideology but also becomes a realistic rule, which is not only an official law in the feudal age, but also a traditional folk strength and rule that have influences on human beings up to now.As a folk rule, not marrying to the namesake have effective effects on the rural regions in Xiangxi ever since. However, with the continuing penetration of economy, modern legal system and culture and so on, its absolutely specific social position in a certain period has gone forever. Even so, whether as a modern folk rule or a concept, it affects the behavior of the public in the rural area to some extent, and becomes an important factor that people have to think about on the marriage. Both the past generation and the coming generation are struggling on the edge of ideology.This study relies on the existence of rural areas in Western Han system of civil marriage, marriage of the same surname does not exist to maintain power. There are four main research contents or questions:First, how to maintain the civil rules of traditional culture, traditional folk rules in the process of maintaining the kind of society facing a choice. Second, how to treat people rule itself has regional characteristics, the area of civil rule in play what role. Thirdly, the elders in such a small community in how to play the role, how to maintain this role of civil rule. The fourth is, hide in the rural areas of influence. Same time, through research and analysis of the rules of civil marriage by same surname does not influence how people make choices, and when people make a choice problems and the inner thoughts.The combination of the current social context, the main research in a particular culture under the impact of transition, the various traditional power itself has struggled to maintain traces of social roles. Trying to better information through research and theoretical argument to explain the literature to express the self-evolution and social change under the struggle. In this background and the small social and cultural conflicts between individuals and social groups in their social choices, visit our main content.By analyzing the conclusion that his idea-the concept of social choice. Social Choice means first and foremost, we are given a choice; followed by a choice of the premise, we must choose; the same time we must take to bring choice to select the price. Of course, there is a philosophy of social choice presume, is to make behavior choices that people are not always rational. Entirely possible that the action under the emotional and traditional, and in particular the choice of civil rules, embodied in the habit of thinking, behavior of the lazy, ideological lag. However, despite our choice of irrational behavior, but as a social choice, we must have enough respect. Embodied in the concept of social choice is a struggle, in the course of this struggle, many of the social elements worthy of our consideration, but because of its irrational nature of the premise of personal choice often becomes a social choice, towards more unity. The social choice has become some people's personal choices, by the profound impact of personal choices. So for social choice, whether rational or not, must have a basic respect and treat and respect the choice the next struggle.