Analysis On The Differences From Selecting System Of Presidents Of The Public Research Universities Between The USA And The Japan

A President is the commander of a school, and his quality decides the universities which can be have a long-term efficiency. The good President selection is clearly tied to the perfect headmaster selection system. The United States and the Japan have many first-class universities, and it is closely related to the successful President selection. The selection system of the President of university have their characteristics of their national conditions, but there are also many discrepancy at the same time. We can learn a lot from the differences between the USA and the Japan. This paper selects the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan from the following aspects as the research object, and tries to discuss and analyze it. In this paper, including six parts:Partâ… :introduction. It elaborates the topic significance and research value, elaborating on the meaning and the value of the research, the current researching situation and the vacancy of current research from three aspects:the President selection system of American universities, the President selection system of Japan universities and the President selection system of national universities.Partâ…¡:summarized and analyzed the history of differences from selecting system of the presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan. Firstly, the essay objectively descript the changes of differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities history between the USA and the Japan from two specific stages and three specific respectively. Then analysis on the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan in autonomy, professional, democratic.Partâ…¢:Descript and analies on the differences of performance from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan from three aspects. The differences include the Presidents' qualifications, the selected institutions and the selecting program. In the qualifications differences, the essay analies respectively from the academic background and administrative management ability and financing ability. Selected agency for differences in analysis, the essay analyzes the University President selection institution type respectively. Selecting program that embodies the difference descripts and analyzes separately from the start stage, select running stage and appoint way.Part IV:This paper analyzes the causes which leads to the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan from four aspects. The four aspects includes the limited of the universities of qualifications function to university of selected system, the influence of traditional management system, the education of the provisions of the selection process of new liberalism, promoting and selection of the system restriction.Part V:Evaluating the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan from publicity, legitimacy, avalidity. Evaluating the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan in publicity from principal candidate and constitutes of electoral. Evaluating the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan in legitimacy from the organization composed of legitimacy, members of the legality of legitimacy and selection procedures. Evaluating the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan in avalidity from the headmaster of the respondents selected ideal design, the headmaster of the real ran the results and the university President deserved evaluation.The last part:The enlightenment in the differences from selecting system of presidents of the public research universities between the USA and the Japan. We can learn more from the differences. The author considers that the President selection of university in Chinese should be faced national and international publicly-elected; Before the administrative appointment, shoud try to school professor election and government administrative appointed. Carrying out the legitimate reform of higher education.